| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| problem converting old code to visual studio .net | 03 Nov 2004 19:18 GMT | 4 |
I'm having trouble converting an old project to visual studio C++ .net v7.1.3088 I've updated one of the header files to use #include <iostream>, and used the std namspace.
|
| debugging | 03 Nov 2004 14:22 GMT | 13 |
is there a way, using windbg.exe and dbgclr.exe together, to debug a mixed DLL? (without using VS IDE) i.e., to sort of make windbg "take over" when it gets to the unmanaged part...
|
| friend CStringT operator+(const CStringT& str1, const CStringT& st | 03 Nov 2004 14:09 GMT | 2 |
Q: Is there a good way to overcome this apparent bug without modifying the mfc code? ___________________________________ Info: Although it is NOT a good idea, I seemed to have perhaps located a
|
| bounce.c compile error | 03 Nov 2004 00:39 GMT | 1 |
trying to compile bounce.c from msvcc's help on multi-thread. i get the error: c:\Applications\C++ Step By Step\begthrd\begthrd.cpp(82): error C2664: '_beginthread' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'void (char *)' to 'void
|
| [Out] param in C++ called from C# | 03 Nov 2004 00:22 GMT | 4 |
I have a managed C++ DLL that contains the following: MyLib.h: // MyLib.h #pragma once
|
| [VS2005] c++ "scope operator" | 03 Nov 2004 00:20 GMT | 3 |
I am using VS 2005. If I compile the following code only line 6 returns me an error while line 9 returns a warning. If I comment the line 6 and debug the program the assignments of lines {9, 11} work fine.
|
| [C++-CLI] Function with variable parameters list | 03 Nov 2004 00:17 GMT | 1 |
this code is from "C++/CLI Language Specification Working Draft 1.7, Sep, 2004" //--- void F(... array<int>^ args)
|
| Stack Overflow using wrapped C++ DLL from C# | 02 Nov 2004 22:25 GMT | 1 |
A third party vendor has provided me a C++ .Net DLL, a .lib and all necessary .h files, as well as a sample C++ .NET app that uses the DLL. The sample app needs the Stack Reserve Size set to 2meg, as well as a few other Compiler and Linker options set. I want to access the ...
|
| Memory Release of C# objects used by MC++ | 02 Nov 2004 19:21 GMT | 1 |
We have a class written in MC++ that has a data member of a class written in C#. When the MC++ goes out of scope, it's destructor is properly called and it's memory is released. However, the C# class Dispose() never gets called, and
|
| Important: VC++ Deleting files | 02 Nov 2004 16:14 GMT | 3 |
Hi, I recently contacted a Microsoft service rep and was directed here. My problem is getting worse and worse. Here is the original message (several days ago): I've been using your Microsoft Visual C++ for my C++ projects for some time
|
| standalone executable application without .NET Framework | 02 Nov 2004 14:54 GMT | 3 |
I want to build a standard application (without .NET Framework features) with my Visual C++.NET. I want to produce a standalone executable application that runs in another PC without .NET Framework. How can i do this? (if there isn't .NET Framework, my application doesn't
|
| Converting textbox->text to integer | 02 Nov 2004 13:45 GMT | 4 |
Could someone tell me how I go about converting textbox->text to and integer value? Thanks Dave
|
| Determining the share a drive for which a drive is mapped | 01 Nov 2004 20:27 GMT | 1 |
Hello World, I am using Visual C++.Net Ver 6 and am hoping to find out how to determine the share name/UNC path that is associated with a specific drive letter. I've looked at the Drive Object documentation, but there is no C++ code to
|
| exporting CStrings from DLL's | 01 Nov 2004 16:43 GMT | 1 |
I'm porting an app from vc++6 to vc++ 7.1, and am having some trouble exporting functions. I can export simple functions from a DLL by simply putting __declspec(dllexport) in front of them, and I can then use them just fine in my app. When I try to export a function with a ...
|
| amd64 and vs.net 2005 | 01 Nov 2004 16:18 GMT | 17 |
Will the final release get inline assembly? It seems a bit odd to allow it for 32-bit but not 64-bit one there are so many optimaztions that can be done. It seems strange to have to code the whole function in asm just to have about 5 lines of asm in a 200 line code block... I'm ...
|