| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| add 2nd cpp file to c++ .NET project | 05 Oct 2003 20:59 GMT | 2 |
I have a .CPP full of orderly, yet unmanaged code that I use in all of my MS Visual C++ 6.0 projects. I use "add existing item" to add the .CPP file to my C++ managed application project.
|
| Template for Basic DLL | 05 Oct 2003 19:25 GMT | 2 |
I use C# for most of my apps but occasionally have to write a DLL using C++, e.g. for global callbacks. They are very simple and basic Dll's usually just using standard Windows libraries, in fact they don't need C++, basic C would be fine.
|
| I need help setting up an example app.... | 05 Oct 2003 02:28 GMT | 13 |
At school, we do all of our coding in emacs, but I am trying to get the example apps working at home using Visual C++.net. In the example, there are 4 .cpp files (canvas.cpp, main.cpp, myDisplay.cpp and tween.cpp) a header file (canvas.h) and a makefile that compiles it for
|
| c++ header files | 04 Oct 2003 03:41 GMT | 3 |
Does Microsoft .NET Framework SDK v1.1 come with the c++ header files for using cl.exe to compile c++ source file? thanks in advance .
|
| Generics vs Templates | 04 Oct 2003 01:36 GMT | 2 |
So whats the deal here regarding Generics in the 2004 release and templates currently in C++?
|
| Handle of console windows | 03 Oct 2003 20:36 GMT | 3 |
How can I get HWND of console windows? I wrote mfc console application and want to use handle for joystick. Thanks.
|
| About LNK2001 in VC++ 2003 | 03 Oct 2003 19:34 GMT | 1 |
Dear Sirs plz Help me I'm Trying compile in C++ .NET 2003 (VS 2003 Enterprise Arcitech) This Code (From MSDN) And Gives LNK2001 Linker Error When i remove "new" operator form constructor all works fine
|
| problems linking legacy code into my managed app | 03 Oct 2003 19:30 GMT | 1 |
I'm trying to use some code that's roughly 20 years old with my C++ .NET app. I get a boatload of errors when trying to compile it - stuff like C2692 for the old-style function declarations, also C4027 and C2197.
|
| gdiplus.h | 03 Oct 2003 19:12 GMT | 1 |
I am using VS.NET 2003 to created a mixed mode exe. I am not using any gdi functions and it compiles fine. If I just include gdiplus.h the linker forces me to link in gdiplus.lib although I am not using any gdi
|
| About DLL | 03 Oct 2003 17:40 GMT | 4 |
I am using a mutiple application sharing a dll. In my application i am loading the dll using LoadLibrary Function. My Question is: 1) I have loaded the dll in the 1st appication
|
| Passing COM autoptr to managed C++ dll | 03 Oct 2003 17:13 GMT | 8 |
I have recently converted all of my native C++ dll's to be compiled with the /CLR switch. After doing this, I notcied a very strange and frustrating issue. One of my managed dll's calls another using a COM smartptr
|
| Reading public constants from VBComponents in C#? I don't think C# knows how.... | 03 Oct 2003 09:23 GMT | 1 |
We are writing a C#.net component that uses a VB.net component, that has a couple of public const's in it, but C# chooses not to see them. What's up with that. The only way we can get it to work is to use public variable... ?!?
|
| Calling Managed code in a mixed C++ dll | 03 Oct 2003 08:12 GMT | 3 |
I am trying to add calls to managed C++ class from unmanaged C in the same DLL (I saw somewhere while trying to solve something else, that if you have them both in the same DLL that you could freely call between managed and unmanaged code with no stress, but i'm living proof that ...
|
| legacy dll callback and pinning pointer | 02 Oct 2003 18:52 GMT | 4 |
I have to interface managed application with my legacy dll. I have employed the wrapper approach but I have to deal with the asynchronous callback from the legacy dll, which likely goes through a thread other than the initial calling thread. I got the idea from MSDN and other ...
|
| Easy casting question (hopefully) | 02 Oct 2003 13:08 GMT | 6 |
I'm getting a boolean property through reflection. That part works fine. Since PropertyInfo->GetValue returns Object*, to use it I need to cast it to a bool. This seems like (and likely is) the simplest thing, but
|