| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Server Application Unavailable | 29 Nov 2003 14:23 GMT | 2 |
New to DotNet world. Using window 2000, installed Dotnet Framwork to use ASP.NET on my system After creating virtual directory . i wrote small script to test asp.net. but i get Server Application Unavailable error.
|
| Adding library to GAC | 27 Nov 2003 06:38 GMT | 3 |
I created a library project. Then I created Setup project which must only register my dll in GAC on deployment machine, in order to do this I addad "primary output" to Global Assembly Cache Folder and deleted
|
| update web.config in a custom action | 25 Nov 2003 23:25 GMT | 1 |
Does anybody know how to update the web.config file in a custom action? I tried to give a local path to the web.config to my utility that does the job well in a case of regular app install but it does not work in the case of the web install.
|
| Web Setup Project | 25 Nov 2003 17:32 GMT | 2 |
I work for a web development company doing custom E- commerce sites. I created a shopping cart module which is supposed to be used as a base when starting a project for a new customer and contains all core functions and
|
| Merge Module | 24 Nov 2003 02:36 GMT | 3 |
I created a setup project with no problem, and the installation is working fine. My program uses MSDE 2000, so I decided to include the MSDE merge modules, the connect.msm, and the other included with msde, but after adding them and compiling my application, my setup doesnt run ...
|
| Registry vs. Config File | 23 Nov 2003 22:27 GMT | 2 |
I have an application with a few settings that need to be external. I understand I can do it a few different ways, including using the registry or an app.config fie. Can anyone offer any recommendations as to when it's best to use one or the other?
|
| Installed Framework 1.1, what next | 21 Nov 2003 19:52 GMT | 2 |
The installation went fine, the files are under C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322 What do I need to do to 'active' it. Everything else is still pointing to v1.0.3705, including the environment
|
| does FW 1.1 run 1.0 apps? | 21 Nov 2003 18:05 GMT | 1 |
i have FW 1.1 installed - do i need to install 1.0 to run an app developed under 1.0? any caveats? THANKS! =)
|
| launch condition | 20 Nov 2003 20:46 GMT | 1 |
I am using Visual.NET 2003 from a MSDN subscription. I am creatiing a setup & deployment project. I have a launch condition call VerifyOperatingSystem which ensures the operating system is newer than Windows 2000. It works fine. I also have RemovePreviousVersion=false in the ...
|
| Deploying MSDE | 20 Nov 2003 20:43 GMT | 1 |
I'm beginning to think that either am I dumb or MSDE deployment really *IS* rocket science. I don't know, but I know I'm not the only one. Anyway, here's my request: I'd like to create a package that will:
|
| Visual Studio 6 | 20 Nov 2003 17:45 GMT | 1 |
I want to install the .NET framework on my PC. I currently have VS 6 installed. I plan on removing all the VS 6 prior to installing .NET. Anyone have any pointers before I take the plunge? Thanks!
|
| Installation Problems Windows NT | 20 Nov 2003 06:51 GMT | 6 |
i tried to install the .NET framework redistributable on a windows NT4.0 machine.. but during the installations process (almost at the end).. an error occurs which says, that he can´t open an registry key? (ERROR 1402) (i have
|
| Can't install .NET framework 1.1 | 20 Nov 2003 06:49 GMT | 1 |
Hi again, I posted this question a few days ago, but still haven't got an answer... I've tried to upgrade .NET framework 1.0 to 1.1. The error was: "can't open an registry key (ERROR
|
| Installer error | 20 Nov 2003 03:38 GMT | 3 |
A little background: I am simply learning how to control the Windows Installer (Setup Projects) Simple project...install application, gather database info, connect to SQL Server, execute SQL Scripts, etc...
|
| compiling upon installation | 19 Nov 2003 21:29 GMT | 1 |
I was under the impression, from books that I have read, that you could develop software in .NET and somehow instruct the installer to actually compile to native code one time only... then, as opposed to having to JIT compile the app every time it runs, the user would experience ...
|