| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Slow remoting of byte[] | 28 Apr 2006 20:28 GMT | 5 |
Hi community! Perhaps someone can explain this performance problem: I'm trying to spool files via remoting over a TCP channel with a binary serializer.
|
| Performance Monitor Not Logging .Net CLR Counters?!? | 26 Apr 2006 15:30 GMT | 4 |
I have duplicated this on 4 different workstations running WinXP and the .Net framework. Viewing any of the .NET CLR counters in PerfMon works fine when viewing then "live," but fails to capture any data when setting them up as scheduled captures under Counter Logs. All of the ...
|
| Q: System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter usage | 24 Apr 2006 23:13 GMT | 1 |
I have a test app where I am using System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter. In the VS.NET 2003 DESIGNER I choose: CategoryName = 'Process' CounterName = '% Processor Time'
|
| string.<insertStaticMethodHere> performance in multithreaded envir | 20 Apr 2006 14:07 GMT | 5 |
The old saying goes something like, "Hey stupid, don't use static methods when you're going to call that function a lot from multiple threads, if you want to have any kind of good performance" at least I think that's how it goes.
|
| cast type check performance | 19 Apr 2006 06:31 GMT | 11 |
Does anyone here has already done some test related to the performance of doing a safe cast? Which one of those two snippet do you think would be a better alternative (relative to performance) most of time?
|
| Delay inside a loop | 17 Apr 2006 19:02 GMT | 10 |
I've got a problem: sometimes a inner loop takes more than 0 milliseconds.. Example-Code (take a windows form, add one button and two textboxes): private void button1_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e) {
|
| Data Performance using DataReaders and DataSets | 17 Apr 2006 03:55 GMT | 1 |
I need to process several million records stored a database and derive several million processed records to be saved. The processing is moderately complex where I need to compare the retrieved records in order to derive the results.
|
| Disk access performance | 12 Apr 2006 12:59 GMT | 4 |
I am working in an application, where multiple threads have parallel disk access to process each one file. The threads are independent, no critical section or syncronization between them exist nor is necesary. They do not process the same file.
|
| DataReader Performance: Is it a myth? | 12 Apr 2006 00:15 GMT | 2 |
I created a simple test scenario that compared the performance of a DataReader vs. a strongly typed DataTable. It seems that it is indeed quicker to traverse the result set when using the DataReader, but once you try to read the actual columns of the data, you lose all the ...
|
| Factory Restore Mistake | 06 Apr 2006 16:42 GMT | 1 |
I made the mistake of doing a "Restore to Factory" before thinking and I lost years of pictures. PLEASE tell me I can get them back. Thanks Barbi
|
| win32 service 2 service communication | 06 Apr 2006 13:40 GMT | 1 |
I have 2 win32 services written using C# that need to communicate with each other. They are passing back and forth large blobs of binary data. Can anyone suggest the best performing way to transfer the data. Right now I am using sockets but I am not sure if its the best way. ...
|
| Hex and int32 | 03 Apr 2006 18:09 GMT | 4 |
I've just been looking at some code that someone's asked me to look at. They guys who wrote it has used Hex numbers for all his constant int32 variables. For example, instead of having: for {int x = 1;x <= 31;x++}
|
| Supress the garbage collector | 03 Apr 2006 18:06 GMT | 2 |
Hey Folks, I know this is taboo but we have a long running highly availble app that is being affected by the garbage collector. In .NET 1.1 there were issues because of the aggressive GC and under 2.0 it
|
| is Large Object Heap Compaction in Framework 1.1/2.0? | 01 Apr 2006 04:32 GMT | 9 |
I read on some message board that i can't find anymore saying that the Large Object Heap is compacted in Framework 1.1 or 2.0. Is this true? I can't seem to find any ms documentation that said this was fixed. Is large object heap fragmentation still going to be a problem in ...
|