Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / Performance / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Slow remoting of byte[]28 Apr 2006 20:28 GMT5
Hi community!
Perhaps someone can explain this performance problem:
I'm trying to spool files via remoting over a TCP channel with a binary
serializer.
Performance Monitor Not Logging .Net CLR Counters?!?26 Apr 2006 15:30 GMT4
I have duplicated this on 4 different workstations running WinXP and the
.Net framework.  Viewing any of the .NET CLR counters in PerfMon works fine
when viewing then "live," but fails to capture any data when setting them up
as scheduled captures under Counter Logs.  All of the ...
Q: System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter usage24 Apr 2006 23:13 GMT1
I have a test app where I am using System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter.
In the VS.NET 2003 DESIGNER I choose:
CategoryName = 'Process'
CounterName = '% Processor Time'
string.<insertStaticMethodHere> performance in multithreaded envir20 Apr 2006 14:07 GMT5
The old saying goes something like, "Hey stupid, don't use static methods
when you're going to call that function a lot from multiple threads, if you
want to have any kind of good performance" at least I think that's how it
goes.
cast type check performance19 Apr 2006 06:31 GMT11
Does anyone here has already done some test related to the performance
of doing a safe cast?
Which one of those two snippet do you think would be a better
alternative (relative to performance) most of time?
Delay inside a loop17 Apr 2006 19:02 GMT10
I've got a problem: sometimes a inner loop takes more than 0 milliseconds..
Example-Code (take a windows form, add one button and two textboxes):
private void button1_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
Data Performance using DataReaders and DataSets17 Apr 2006 03:55 GMT1
I need to process several million records stored a database and derive
several million processed records to be saved.
The processing is moderately complex where I need to compare the retrieved
records in order to derive the results.
Disk access performance12 Apr 2006 12:59 GMT4
I am working in an application, where multiple threads have parallel disk
access to process each one file.  The threads are independent, no critical
section or syncronization between them exist nor is necesary. They do not
process the same file.
DataReader Performance: Is it a myth?12 Apr 2006 00:15 GMT2
I created a simple test scenario that compared the performance of a
DataReader vs. a strongly typed DataTable. It seems that it is indeed
quicker to traverse the result set when using the DataReader, but once you
try to read the actual columns of the data, you lose all the ...
Factory Restore Mistake06 Apr 2006 16:42 GMT1
I made the mistake of doing a "Restore to Factory" before thinking and I lost
years of pictures. PLEASE tell me I can get them back.
Thanks Barbi
win32 service 2 service communication06 Apr 2006 13:40 GMT1
I have 2 win32 services written using C# that need to communicate with each
other.   They are passing back and forth large blobs of binary data.   Can
anyone suggest the best performing way to transfer the data.  Right now I am
using sockets but I am not sure if its the best way. ...
Hex and int3203 Apr 2006 18:09 GMT4
I've just been looking at some code that someone's asked me to look at. They
guys who wrote it has used Hex numbers for all his constant int32 variables.
For example, instead of having:
for {int x = 1;x <= 31;x++}
Supress the garbage collector03 Apr 2006 18:06 GMT2
Hey Folks,
I know this is taboo but we have a long running highly availble app that is
being affected by the garbage collector.
In .NET 1.1 there were issues because of the aggressive GC and under 2.0 it
is Large Object Heap Compaction in Framework 1.1/2.0?01 Apr 2006 04:32 GMT9
I read on some message board that i can't find anymore saying that the Large
Object Heap is compacted in Framework 1.1 or 2.0.  Is this true? I can't seem
to find any ms documentation that said this was fixed.  Is large object heap
fragmentation still going to be a problem in ...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.