| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Monitoring ThreadPool threads? | 22 Dec 2005 13:39 GMT | 7 |
All, I have an application that has asynchronous HTTPWebRequest calls incorporated into it. While I am waiting for a handler that monitors the connection for a timeout I want to monitor the thread itself in the
|
| Frage zum Compact Framework | 22 Dec 2005 11:28 GMT | 2 |
Hallo liebe Kollegen, schreibe gerade mein erstes Programm für den PPC mit dem CF. Die so ziemlich erste Anweisung in meinem Programm ist die Ermittlung des
|
| Issues with Streamwriter class | 22 Dec 2005 05:25 GMT | 1 |
Iam using streamwriter class of .net to write in a file. The location of file is a network drive. Now if for some reason the network is not there and I execute sw.close I get a exception ( that's ok).
|
| Application Services Database and SQL Server 2000 | 21 Dec 2005 21:44 GMT | 1 |
I do not have SQL Server 2005 installed on my computer and will not be able to based on company policy. However I do have SQL Server 2000. I want to create the application service database to store personalization setting for using web parts.
|
| Who can explain this exception? | 21 Dec 2005 21:20 GMT | 1 |
************** Exception Text ************** System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: Not enough storage is available to process this command at System.Windows.Forms.Form.UpdateLayered()
|
| Rotor | 21 Dec 2005 18:07 GMT | 1 |
What's up with the Shared Source CLI implementation (a.k.a Rotor)? What's its status? It's a dead project or it's still being developed? It will include the .NET 2.0 functionality and specification?
|
| Remoting between 2.0 and 1.1 | 21 Dec 2005 16:05 GMT | 4 |
I have a 3rd party 1.1 framework dll that I want to use in a .net 2.0 application. Alvin Bruney already told me here that I can't use it as a reference in my 2.0 app because it will be run in 2.0. So, I'm wondering if it's possible to make a little 1.1 app that will reference ...
|
| Generic Identity and Integrated Security with SQL | 21 Dec 2005 14:38 GMT | 3 |
I have setup the following lines of code: System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetPrincipalPolicy(Security.Principal.PrincipalPolicy.WindowsPrincipal) mPrincipal = System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal mUser = mPrincipal.Identity
|
| .NET 2.0 Deployment - How to deploy with no Framework 2.0 installe | 21 Dec 2005 14:22 GMT | 3 |
I am doing winforms app using ver 2.0. My boss is concerning that about 40% of our end-users wont be willing to download and install Framework 2.0 to run the app. I am looking into thinstall.com and remotesoft.com for tools to create
|
| How to find a block in Finalize()? | 21 Dec 2005 13:09 GMT | 2 |
I'm using .NET Framework 1.1, C#. A couple of days before I've found out that my application leaks memory not releasing objects with destructors. I'm using some third-party components (Spring.NET and Oracle Data Provider .NET (ODP.NET is actually a leak in my case)). I know that ...
|
| The application is improperly formatted - ClickOnce | 21 Dec 2005 10:02 GMT | 3 |
I'm suddenly having some problems with clickOnce deplyment of a windows form. Up till now I have succesfully published and downloaded updates without problems. But today, after adding some new buttons and icons, I get
|
| COM | 21 Dec 2005 09:48 GMT | 3 |
i use a class (see below), which I has found at http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/eng/samples/dotnet_dynpinvoke.asp, to unregister ActiveX components. The class works fine. But I have following problem. After I had unregister the ActiveX components I want to delete
|
| Precision error? | 21 Dec 2005 09:03 GMT | 4 |
I have written a simple code as follorws: //************* BEGIN CODE ****************** double a; a= 106.3 - 137.3
|
| .NET Remoting Bug - fixed in 1.0 SP3? | 21 Dec 2005 05:14 GMT | 1 |
All, Can anyone tell me whether the bug mentioned at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;322975 was fixed in the .NET Framework 1.0 SP3?
|
| strong-name - framework 1.1 and framework 2.0 | 21 Dec 2005 03:14 GMT | 3 |
I have an application that is a asp.net and uses some dlls. This dlls are signed with a strong-name key. When I sign a dll using framework 1.1 and a file.snk I get a key XXX. And when I sign dll using framwork 2.0 and the same file.snk I get a key ZZZ.
|