| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| How to work distributed transactions without MTS--Win2000 | 30 Mar 2005 08:32 GMT | 3 |
Hi Every one How to work distributed transactions without MTS , using Windows 2000 server . We can work it out in windows 2003 server environment using ServiceConfig, ServiceDomain.
|
| COM+ Object - Class doesn't support Automation for other user, just me? | 29 Mar 2005 14:26 GMT | 3 |
I've created a VS.Net COM+ Object in VB.Net and have been able to write a test App on the PC that I created the COM+ object and it works great. I then had one heck of a time getting the COM+ Object installed on our Webserver (Win2003, IIS6 & .Net Framework) I'm still pretty sure I ...
|
| COM+ app can't locate Assembly in the GAC | 22 Mar 2005 16:13 GMT | 6 |
I'm writting a COM+ app, which uses dynamic class loading to load up an instance of a class from an assembly, using: Activator.CreateInstance(strAssemblyName, strClassName); I've placed the required assembly in the GAC, but I still get the dreaded
|
| Simple Question : Can we expose COM+ object from a services using .NET? | 21 Mar 2005 03:12 GMT | 2 |
I have searched hi & low, I reached to "No" but I cannot believe my conclusion ... The question is simple, Can we expose COM+ component (Serviced Component) from a service using
|
| Queued Components and Strong Names | 17 Mar 2005 18:10 GMT | 1 |
Our existing ASP.NET application needs to support a new asynchronous processing model. Basically, a user interaction will cause an activity to happen...the ASP.NET page returns immediately to the user while this activity runs off in the background on the server.
|
| Should ServicedComponent constructor be "light"? | 17 Mar 2005 02:07 GMT | 2 |
I just spent a couple of days trying to make .NET component wrapped in a ServicedComponent class to work. It used to work before and almost in a sudden started throwing exceptions. After numerous trials and failures I found out the following:
|
| Multiple COM+ apps coexisting | 17 Mar 2005 01:58 GMT | 1 |
Hi, we have as assembly signed with a keyfile thats in a COM+ application. We take the same assembly but sign it with a different keyfile and add it to another COM+ application. The first application proxy will install fine on a IIS server but the
|
| Question Rephrase : Outprocess COM+ using .NET? | 16 Mar 2005 18:21 GMT | 3 |
A simple question, I might have something wrong with my concepts, so point it to me. Please this is important so if you have any lead just send it along. Can we expose COM+ object out-process?
|
| com+ persistant subscriptions | 16 Mar 2005 18:04 GMT | 1 |
It seems like I have tried everything but I simply can't find a solution. How can I add persistant subscriptions programatically. I need to setup my subscriptions during my application installation. ----------------------- Posted by a user from .NET 247 (http://www.dotnet247.com/)
|