| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Object pooling timeouts | 06 Mar 2004 01:09 GMT | 1 |
Suppose I configure a class with object pooling, minpoolsize=5 and maxpoolsize=20. When my client calls the component for the first time, will COM+ creates 5 instances of my component in advance?
|
| Debugging issue | 04 Mar 2004 16:01 GMT | 1 |
Hi, I have a certain problem & looking for some suggestion please: 1. I created DLL (Class Libraries Managed code)using VB.NET which are deployed onto the client. 2. If the client encounters a problem, in order for them to realize if
|
| COM+ and C# | 04 Mar 2004 15:59 GMT | 1 |
I am currently working with a C# solution within COM+ with an Oracle 9.2.0.3 backend. I have the following questions. 1.) Should there be one Oracle Session per COM+ transaction?
|
| ASP.NET Question Regarding COM+ vs Web Services | 03 Mar 2004 19:41 GMT | 3 |
First I am a COM+ newbie. 1. How can I access COM+ applications from ASP.NET? 2. Why use COM+ instead of a web service, transactional support? Thank In Advance.
|
| SendKeys - PostMessage problem | 03 Mar 2004 14:51 GMT | 2 |
Probably a quick one, I'm using PostMessage to send keys to an applicatoin but how do I convert the key string to a long values so that I can pass this to the wParam. The definition is below Private Declare Auto Function PostMessage Lib "user32" ( _
|
| [AutoComplete] and No class interface error when there is one | 03 Mar 2004 14:12 GMT | 9 |
I get the classic error when I register my ServicedComponent with regsvcs: WARNING: The class 'AdTools.AuthenticatedComServer' has no class interface, whic
|
| Application Root Directory and config files | 03 Mar 2004 07:55 GMT | 2 |
I would like to have a config file to my Serviced component where I can keep a SQL connection string. I have found some information when searching saying that I should set the "Application Root Directory" to the folder where I keep my configuration file and rename the file to ...
|
| Marshal.ReleaseComObject() + object pooling on Windows Server 2003 | 01 Mar 2004 20:36 GMT | 8 |
my pooled queued components are not being released by Marshal.ReleaseComObject() on Windows Server 2003. The component processes the queue messages just fine, but number of activated objects in COM+ MMC grows with each activation. It gets released,
|
| Using EnterpriseServices with Remoting | 01 Mar 2004 15:05 GMT | 1 |
I want to use a serviced Component using JITA and Object Pooling as a server activated remoting component, as ServicedComponent inherits MarshalByRefObject. As the Component uses JITA and Object Pooling, it's stateless.
|
| AutoComplete and ContextUtil.DeactivateOnReturn | 01 Mar 2004 14:54 GMT | 1 |
What is the difference between AutoComplete attribute and ContextUtil.DeactivateOnReturn method? I would like to use AutoComplete. However I want to find out if stamping a method with AutoComplete is less efficient than calling DeactivateOnReturn method when using
|
| ObjectPooling attribute | 01 Mar 2004 14:53 GMT | 1 |
We have a situation where object pooling may be used or not and it will be decided by the machine on which our serviced component is installed. The documentation for ObjectPoolingAttribute indicates that if a serviced component is stamped with this attribute, it should not be ...
|
| AutoComplete | 01 Mar 2004 08:40 GMT | 1 |
We have a question about the transactionshandler in COM+ We have transaction-objects like [TransactionAttribute(TransactionOption.Required), JustInTimeActivation()] public class BookTransaction : ServicedComponent
|
| COM+ Application Shutdown Cleanup | 01 Mar 2004 08:38 GMT | 1 |
I have developed a simple COM+ Component that I?ve enabled Object Pooling on. It works just fine except that it doesn?t execute Dispose or Finalize when the COM+ Application is being shut down. What do i have to do ? The class inherits ServicedComponent by the way.
|
| Use of static methods | 01 Mar 2004 07:32 GMT | 3 |
I was wondering if I can use static methods in a class that derives from the ServicedComponent. The expected callers of my class will be only other .NET clients and the static methods require COM+ services such as support for automatic
|