| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Assembly Version | 15 Sep 2003 12:30 GMT | 2 |
I have an issue with the Assembly Version. I am getting 0.0.0.0 as the version number!!! I tried recompilng ...but no luck.... Any ideas why this is happening and how I could overcome this one!! Thanks for all the help in advance.
|
| Problem serializing custom exception type deriving from System.Exception | 14 Sep 2003 22:52 GMT | 1 |
I've created a new exception w/ a few properties specific to an app I want this this exception to be a part of. Whenever I attempt to serialize the exception I get something resembling the following error: System.InvalidOperationException: There was an error reflecting type ...
|
| ExecutionEngineException & .NET Remoting | 12 Sep 2003 23:43 GMT | 5 |
I'm trying to web deployment an application which utilizes .NET Remoting and I'm getting an intermittent 'System.ExecutionEngineException' exception (top-level call stack shown below). The exception does
|
| Build problem | 12 Sep 2003 21:08 GMT | 2 |
I don't know why I'm the only one in my development team get this build error when I build the entire solution. CommonLib.dll is a binary file resulted of building another project included in the solution. Has anyone had similar problem? Thanks!
|
| Why aren't unsigned types CLS-compliant? | 12 Sep 2003 07:16 GMT | 2 |
Any explanation would be appreciated...
 Signature Regards, Fernando
|
| Are there CLR in other platform yet? | 11 Sep 2003 21:07 GMT | 1 |
e.g. Linux, and...if one such CLR exists, what classes does it support? I heard that the support is much fewer than that of the windows counterpart....
|
| invoke on UI thread | 11 Sep 2003 14:45 GMT | 5 |
I understand the notion that a UI thread should be responsible for managing the UI elements; therefore, worker threads need to call invoke. I don't understand the technical reason for this. What is it about the
|
| How to tell if an assembly in download cache has been updated? | 11 Sep 2003 06:27 GMT | 1 |
Tried this in m.p.framework a couple of days ago with no response. I'll try here: I'm loading an assembly from a URL using Assembly.LoadFrom(). Is there any way to tell if the current version of the assembly already existed in the application download cache.
|
| Deserialization "cannot find the assembly" when hosting exe from own loader | 10 Sep 2003 00:44 GMT | 1 |
I use the simple loader that hosts the managed application (I need this to load the "svr" version on a server). I use the code suggested by Steven Pratschner [MS] in news article http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=%23nx5kl9HDHA.2256%40TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl.
|
| One DLL - Two apps? | 10 Sep 2003 00:21 GMT | 2 |
Is it possible to have 2 .NET applications sharing the same .NET DLL in memory? Meaning I don't want each app to have its own copy (and the DLL is a .NET dll).
|
| Writing in .config XML application configuration file. | 09 Sep 2003 19:49 GMT | 5 |
I was trying to find an easy way to write in the standard configuration (like app.config) xml-based files. I found classes that can be used to read this information (in System.Configuration) like the ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings property, but I was not able to find
|
| Exceptions in event firing | 09 Sep 2003 14:51 GMT | 1 |
This case was tried in VC++.NET. I subscribe a .NET event from a remote client app (just add it up to the event delegator). My server app fires the event and everything goes well
|
| How to get CLR version in runtime | 07 Sep 2003 18:14 GMT | 2 |
Can I get CLR version in runtime (just for the demo purposes)? Thanks Martin Skrenek
|
| Memory Management | 06 Sep 2003 10:15 GMT | 2 |
A Show Stopper problem in our application we have a DLL which exposes some objects collections in terms of get and set properties. The objects have very heavy memory footprints (beyond 2gb) we want to have the funcionality that if the memory usage goes beyond a
|
| Writing Code for Semi-trusted Environment | 06 Sep 2003 00:56 GMT | 1 |
I have put an article on the subject in my blog at http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/ivanmed. I am sure it will be interesting to many of you, especially in the dotnet.security group, so please feel free to check in out and leave your
|