Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Windows Forms / WinForm General / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WFP, WF, WCF and CAB

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Gower - 26 Jul 2007 17:50 GMT
Is the introduction of these new technologies going to change the way that
CAB works or will CAB still use basically the same architecture?

Bill
Bob Powell [MVP] - 26 Jul 2007 22:11 GMT
CAB is an unsupported Patterns and Practices guideline which is destined
for the scrap-heap.

Before you cry out in pain don't despair. CAB promotes many excellent
practices including a great deal of architectural and pattern usage
guidance. In particular the Dependency Injection system.

The lessons learned from CAB are currently being built into the new
application framework Acropolis which is in an early CTP form at the
moment but which will have great influence on future application
development systems, especially in the Orcas time-frame.

In my day job we have used CAB extensively and are currently studying
the Acropolis migration path which, Microsoft assures me, will be
relatively painless.

Signature

Bob Powell [MVP]
Visual C#, System.Drawing

Ramuseco Limited .NET consulting
http://www.ramuseco.com

Find great Windows Forms articles in Windows Forms Tips and Tricks
http://www.bobpowell.net/tipstricks.htm

Answer those GDI+ questions with the GDI+ FAQ
http://www.bobpowell.net/faqmain.htm

All new articles provide code in C# and VB.NET.
Subscribe to the RSS feeds provided and never miss a new article.

> Is the introduction of these new technologies going to change the way that
> CAB works or will CAB still use basically the same architecture?
>
> Bill
Bill Gower - 27 Jul 2007 02:43 GMT
The reason that I ask is that Microsoft Press has just published a book on
CAB that looks interesting but if CAB is dead or dying, is it even worth
purchasing the book and getting into CAB for an upcoming project?

Bill

> CAB is an unsupported Patterns and Practices guideline which is destined
> for the scrap-heap.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> Bill
Bob Powell [MVP] - 27 Jul 2007 22:00 GMT
My opinion; Yes.

The migration route from CAB to Acropolis is supposed to be smooth.

I do consulting work fo a world renowned bank and we have based a lot of our
technology on CAB for this very reason.

Signature

--
Bob Powell [MVP]
Visual C#, System.Drawing

Ramuseco Limited .NET consulting
http://www.ramuseco.com

Find great Windows Forms articles in Windows Forms Tips and Tricks
http://www.bobpowell.net/tipstricks.htm

Answer those GDI+ questions with the GDI+ FAQ
http://www.bobpowell.net/faqmain.htm

All new articles provide code in C# and VB.NET.
Subscribe to the RSS feeds provided and never miss a new article.

> The reason that I ask is that Microsoft Press has just published a book on
> CAB that looks interesting but if CAB is dead or dying, is it even worth
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>>
>>> Bill

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.