Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Windows Forms / WinForm General / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

.NET 3.0

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jared - 18 Jul 2006 08:21 GMT
Any bug fixes?
Larry Lard - 18 Jul 2006 10:33 GMT
> Any bug fixes?

No. Take a look at
<http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/06/09/624300.aspx> and you
will see that what is now going to be called '.NET Framework 3.0' is
"comprised of the *existing* .NET Framework 2.0 components, including
ASP.NET, WinForms, ADO.NET, additional base class libraries and the CLR,
as well as new developer-focused innovative technologies in WPF, WCF, WF
and WCS". That is, the WinForms and WebForms stuff we have now isn't
changing. Some people think it's unfortunate to up the version number of
something when it isn't changing, merely having new bits bolted on. But
there you go.

Signature

Larry Lard
larrylard@googlemail.com
The address is real, but unread - please reply to the group
For VB and C# questions - tell us which version

William Stacey [MVP] - 19 Jul 2006 03:59 GMT
yeh, I don't quite understand the heart burn some folks are having over
that.  I mean its about double the size of 2.0.  And the framework itself is
nothing but a bunch of libraries that they stamp with a version number so
you can expect certain libs to be in the framework.  Same thing here.  They
added a lot more apis and gave fx got a new stamp.  I mean the kernel does
not need to change to roll out a new OS with a bunch of new stuff ontop it.
That said, it seems like a hard thing to pass up doing pending fixes on
core.  I can only guess the versioning issues for everyone would be too
drastic of a change and delay too many things at this point.  Its still in
CTP, so maybe things will change.  Not sure.  Anyone know of killer bugs in
2.0 that will not be fixed?

Signature

William Stacey [MVP]

| > Any bug fixes?
|
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
| something when it isn't changing, merely having new bits bolted on. But
| there you go.
Jared - 19 Jul 2006 23:50 GMT
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio

1,505 Resolved bugs
Bruce Wood - 20 Jul 2006 01:55 GMT
> Any bug fixes?

Apparently not, but supposedly there are service packs coming out for
.NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 later this year that will fix bugs.

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.