Lester,
I am afraid I should tell you the bad news. The current momentum is towards
Web 2.0 applications (read AJAX, SOA etc.), which are technologically based
on DHTML, JavaScript, XML, XSL etc. Probably it's just a trend, but all
these topics receive the most of book writers' attention nowadays.
If you are seriously persistent about developing your app as a Smart Client,
at least consider ClickOnce deployment, since one of the main Web
applications' benefits is no-hassle deployment, especially in corporate
Intranets. And ClickOnce enables you to ensure your desktop application is
deployed as smoothly as possible.

Signature
Regards,
Dmytro Lapshyn [MVP]
http://blogs.vbcity.com/DmytroL
> Thanks for the resources Dymtro but do you think there is a lot of
> momentum
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> http://www.ddj.com/dept/windows/188703075;jsessionid=HP4RDYQQTUQ4WQSNDLRSKH0CJUNN2JVN
LesterBurnham - 26 Jun 2006 02:01 GMT
Thanks Dymtro
That clarifies things for me. I will still go with the Smart Client
architecture as I think it is a better model for the development and also I
have the benefit of developing the app for one large client who can install
Net Framework 2 as needed.
I think that once the framework is installed across a wider base we will see
more of this type of app and say goodbye to the usage of several different
technologies to implement a solution:
ASP
HTML
DHTML
SOA
AJAX
XML
Javascript
etc
etc
It seems like we keep piling on the technologies to try and get to a point
that Smart Client architecture is already at. I think we make our already
difficult jobs all the harder by doing things this way.
Cheers
Richard
> Lester,
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >>
> >> http://www.ddj.com/dept/windows/188703075;jsessionid=HP4RDYQQTUQ4WQSNDLRSKH0CJUNN2JVN
Otis Mukinfus - 26 Jun 2006 12:24 GMT
>Thanks Dymtro
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Richard
[snip]
Amen Lester!
Good luck with your project,
Otis Mukinfus
http://www.arltex.com
http://www.tomchilders.com