> Which of the 2 has an easier to use debugger, what has better variable
> value
> display, stepping, function returns, stack display etc.
>
> thanks
I'm sure you'll get varying opinions on the debuggers, so I'm suggesting a
different criterion for selection.
IMHO, you should consider the vastly better and standards-compliant C++
compiler that comes with Visual Studio 2005 as a key advantage.

Signature
Peter [MVP Visual Developer]
Jack of all trades, master of none.
dave - 12 Jan 2006 15:45 GMT
So far I haven't got one opinion:)
Is it vastly better because it makes faster running optimized code?
Standards aren't as big a concern for me as is my groups productivity, with
varying levels of skill,
I like them to have a good IDE the one that came with VS6 has been fine. But
in some instances it can't
display variables values or it opens files not directly part of the project
and tries to step through them which is
not necessary, these are files time tested by MS.
We'll probably upgrade but it may still be a while, i'm thinking another
year or two.
> > Which of the 2 has an easier to use debugger, what has better variable
> > value
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Peter [MVP Visual Developer]
> Jack of all trades, master of none.
pvdg42 - 13 Jan 2006 12:41 GMT
> So far I haven't got one opinion:)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> We'll probably upgrade but it may still be a while, i'm thinking another
> year or two.
I noticed the lack of opinions and I'm a bit surprised.
You might want to try posting your question in:
microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc
I'm pretty sure you'll get opinions there :)