Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Visual Studio.NET / General / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Upgarde or not?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Matthias Gutehall - 27 Jul 2003 11:39 GMT
Hi all
I have vs.net 2002 and was wondering if I should upgrade to 2003 or not.
Is 2003 better than 2002?

Signature

TIA
Matthias Gutehall
http://www.gulo.nu

Sven Carstensen - 28 Jul 2003 08:50 GMT
Hi,

> Hi all
> I have vs.net 2002 and was wondering if I should upgrade to 2003 or not.
> Is 2003 better than 2002?

some people call it a huge Service Pack with lots of improvements in the
details and some major ones:

C++ standard compliance is much better
C++ forms editor
improved WebService reference wizard
Framework 1.1 support

I like the alphabetical sorting in the solution explorer better than the
random of 2002

And the upgrade price of $29 when you upgrade soon is another good reason to
keep your system up to date. Who knows how the upgrade conditions for the
next studio are which is expected end of 2004. Maybe you need 2003 to get a
cheap 2004.

Signature

SvenC
E-Mail: Exchange the capital letters and reverse everything right of @

Ben Taylor - 28 Jul 2003 19:28 GMT
it'd have a job to be much worse

> Hi all
> I have vs.net 2002 and was wondering if I should upgrade to 2003 or not.
> Is 2003 better than 2002?
Louis Lafreniere [VC++ Dev] - 30 Jul 2003 19:31 GMT
>From: "Matthias Gutehall" <matthias@gulo.nu>
>Message-ID: <#oAhtqCVDHA.2040@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
>
>Hi all
>I have vs.net 2002 and was wondering if I should upgrade to 2003 or not.
>Is 2003 better than 2002?

I might be biased, but I think the upgrade is a no brainer in this case:
o  cheap at $29
o  much better C++ conformance
o  improved optimizations especially when targetting Pentium4
o  more polished IDE
o  tons of bug fixes

Signature

Louis Lafreniere, Microsoft Visual C++ Dev Team
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm

David Lowndes - 30 Jul 2003 23:18 GMT
>I might be biased, but I think the upgrade is a no brainer in this case:

You forgot:

o   newly introduced bugs

... but I agree with you anyway! VS2003 is generally a useful no
brainer (for want of a better term) upgrade decision given the low
cost.

Dave
Signature

MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq

David Lowndes - 31 Jul 2003 00:07 GMT
.. and I forgot to add a smiley somewhere in my message.

Dave
Signature

MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.