Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Visual Studio.NET / Extensibility / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How about the VC++?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
workaholic - 24 Nov 2006 16:49 GMT
Many a programmer told me that VC++ is stable enough to learn while .Net
can't be that authentic, what do you think ?
William DePalo [MVP VC++] - 26 Nov 2006 02:05 GMT
> Many a programmer told me that VC++ is stable
> enough to learn

FWIW: It's stable enough for me to use om a daily basis.

> while .Net can't be that authentic, what do you think ?

I'm guessing there is a language problem here. Authentic has similar meaning
to "genuine".  .Net exists as a platform for building and running
applications. In that sense it is authentic. What did you mean to ask?

Regards,
Will
workaholic - 26 Nov 2006 10:31 GMT
William DePalo [MVP VC++] 写道:
>> Many a programmer told me that VC++ is stable
>> enough to learn
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Regards,
> Will

I am sorry as I am not an English native speaker, I means that .Net may
be not stable enough, just part of Microsoft's strategy to fight against
Java, after you spend a lot time on it, then you may find it altered and
discarded.
How do you think about it?
Regards,
Liu
Carlos J. Quintero [VB MVP] - 27 Nov 2006 09:32 GMT
Hi Liu,

First of all, this forum is for Visual Studio extensibility (macros,
add-ins, SDK packages, etc.) so you won't get many answers here for that
question. That said:

You need to use the right tool for the job.

That means that:

- If you want an application that runs on multiple operating systems (not
something that I recommend without matching the look and feel of each OS),
you would choose Java, because that is the main purpose of that language.

- If you want an app written in a very stable and standard language
(although not the most productive), you would use ANSI C++, for example.

- If you want an app only for Windows where you don't need powerful
computers to develop or run (and you don't mind to use the Windows API for
many purposes), then you could use VB6, although it is being deprecated so
it is not a wise long-term decision.

- If you want an app only for Windows written in a productive OOP language
with a very good class library, you would use VB.NET or C#, depending on
your syntax preference. You can use also .NET C++.

Finally, although many Microsoft assets (Windows, Office) are written in C++
and not in .NET, many other Microsoft products are using .NET for portions
of the new developments so it will stay with us for many years. Of course,
everything will be altered as new programming paradigms emerge over the
years; that includes Java, .NET and everything else.

My 2 cents.

Signature

Best regards,

Carlos J. Quintero

MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio
You can code, design and document much faster:
http://www.mztools.com

> I am sorry as I am not an English native speaker, I means that .Net may
> be not stable enough, just part of Microsoft's strategy to fight against
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Regards,
> Liu
Eric - 20 Dec 2006 13:53 GMT
> Many a programmer told me that VC++ is stable enough to learn while .Net
>  can't be that authentic, what do you think ?

VC++ isn't nearly as stable as COBOL. Sometimes you really want a
tried-and-true language that has stood the test of time and been around
since the 1960's. Or perhaps Fortran would be good.

Windows itself isn't as stable as unix, or good old mainframe OS's.

There's no reason to go with more modern OS's or languages, is there?

Or, perhaps you need to reflect on the marketing phrase "where do you
want to go today?". And I would add "how long do you want to take to
get there?" and "will my users appreciate the results of my work given
the realistic time contraints imposed on me?".

High productivity, highly functional UI's, and a relatively smaller
number of unexpected bugs may drive you to a more modern platform and
toolset.

Eric

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.