 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / ASP.NET / Web Services / August 2004How to tell wsdl.exe/VS.NET to put [Serializable] on classes
Hi, How can one tell wsdl.exe/VS.NET web service proxy generatioon to to put [Serializable] on imported classes? For example, i fin your web service you use a class: [Serializable] class Data { } and in your method you return this data, the automatically generated client side proxy will not have the [Serializable] attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? no, I don't think so. what is the problem you are trying to solve? Are there ill-effects from this? -D > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > side proxy will not have the [Serializable] > attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? The problem is that these classes are not Serializable across AppDomains (Although XmlSerializer can serialize them just fine). And creating a class that derives from these classes doesn't help either. Because even if you mark derived class to be [Serializable] remoting this type still fails because base class is not [Serializable]. So, one is forced into creating exact duplicate classes with same fields and then copying data. > no, I don't think so. > what is the problem you are trying to solve? [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] >> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? what is the problem you are trying to solve? can you just modify the generated code to include the attribute you want? -D > The problem is that these classes are not Serializable across AppDomains > (Although XmlSerializer can serialize them just fine). And creating a [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >>> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] >>> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? > can you just modify the generated code to include the attribute you want? Of course, but it will get reset with next update of the file. What's the reason for proxy generators not to include [Serialzable] attribute or to provide some control over it. > what is the problem you are trying to solve? > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >>>> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] >>>> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? I don't know the answer to those questions. sorry. >> can you just modify the generated code to include the attribute you want? > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >>>>> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] >>>>> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? Why don't you inherit from the proxy class and use attributes in this class? > > can you just modify the generated code to include the attribute you want? > [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > >>>> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] > >>>> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? Al, > Why don't you inherit from the proxy class and use attributes in this class? That wouldn't work. He probably needs the Serializable attribute on the message classes, not on the proxy itself.  SignatureTomas Restrepo tomasr@mvps.org I need Serializable attribute on the various structs that are pulled in with web service proxy. i.e.: public class Service1 : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol {} /// <remarks/> [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute(Namespace=http://tempuri.org/)] <<<-------------I want [Serializable] here public class Data {} And you can't do the following when remoting the type: [Serializable] class Data2: Data{} Not going to work. > Why don't you inherit from the proxy class and use attributes in this > class? [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >> >>>> side proxy will not have the [Serializable] >> >>>> attribute set. Is there anything that controls this behavior? > I need Serializable attribute on the various structs that are pulled in with > web service proxy. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > <<<-------------I want [Serializable] here > public class Data {} I'm happy to report that the latest version of WSContract First from Christian Weyer can do this for you :) http://weblogs.asp.net/cweyer/archive/2004/08/30/222725.aspx SignatureTomas Restrepo tomasr@mvps.org
Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.