Thanks, but I already did that. I have a trace tool for the XML, and it looks
fine and conformant to the schema. This is document literal, BTW. No weird
soap encoding nonsense.
> You probably can in different ways... but I'd suggest u first use
> tcpTrace [0] and check the soap messages and see if they conform to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > what it doesn't like? Is there a way to turn on some kind of tracing or
> > logging, or to get it to allow me to step into the deserialization code?
Out of curiosity, did you also try taking your xml trace and writing a
small lil console app that tries to deserialize the trace that you have
into the expected type?
> Thanks, but I already did that. I have a trace tool for the XML, and it looks
> fine and conformant to the schema. This is document literal, BTW. No weird
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>>what it doesn't like? Is there a way to turn on some kind of tracing or
>>>logging, or to get it to allow me to step into the deserialization code?

Signature
HTH
Regards,
Dilip Krishnan
MCAD, MCSD.net
dkrishnan at geniant dot com
http://www.geniant.com
frustratedWithDotNet - 01 Mar 2005 02:03 GMT
No, how does one manually invoke deserialization for a fragment of XML?
> Out of curiosity, did you also try taking your xml trace and writing a
> small lil console app that tries to deserialize the trace that you have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >>>what it doesn't like? Is there a way to turn on some kind of tracing or
> >>>logging, or to get it to allow me to step into the deserialization code?
Dilip Krishnan - 01 Mar 2005 02:42 GMT
Use the XmlSerializer class...
> No, how does one manually invoke deserialization for a fragment of XML?
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>>>>what it doesn't like? Is there a way to turn on some kind of tracing or
>>>>>logging, or to get it to allow me to step into the deserialization code?

Signature
HTH
Regards,
Dilip Krishnan
MCAD, MCSD.net
dkrishnan at geniant dot com
http://www.geniant.com