FYI: SH1 appears to have been Broken

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

James Hancock - 16 Feb 2005 15:30 GMT

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/16/0146218&from=rss

Reply to this Message

SA - 17 Feb 2005 00:30 GMT

There seems to be a lot of controversy around this.

I am by no means a cryptographer and hardly understand the lingo used, but
until the cryptographic community actually confirms this, I will not be
scared to death. (Although I will be cautious and keep looking out for
updates on this issue.)

Just my two cents,

Signature

Sven.

> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/16/0146218&from=rss

Reply to this Message

Softwaremaker - 20 Feb 2005 13:09 GMT

It sure is something to watch out for, although it is still in the 2^69
region...but you know the phrase "chink in the armour" ;)

Signature

Thank you.

Regards,
William T (Softwaremaker)
http://www.softwaremaker.net/blog
=========================================

> There seems to be a lot of controversy around this.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/16/0146218&from=rss

Reply to this Message

James Hancock - 21 Feb 2005 18:36 GMT

"Time to walk, not run, walk to changing away from SHA1"

I think that's a great quote.

> It sure is something to watch out for, although it is still in the 2^69
> region...but you know the phrase "chink in the armour" ;)
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/16/0146218&from=rss

Reply to this Message

Rate this thread:

FYI: SH1 appears to have been Broken

Free Magazines