Yes, our webservice is already secured by an SSL cert.
My question, if it wasn't clear, does the use of a digital signature
gain anything?
I can definitly see the pros if not wanting to use SSL or the possible
performace degradation of SSL.
But if already using an SSL cert, why do I need to do the other?
> Can SSL security be used in Web Servicves?I think the better way is
> using of SOAP extension to sign/verify or encrypt/decrypt soap
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Thanks,
Rory Plaire - 02 Dec 2004 20:47 GMT
gm0ney <gm0ney@night-storm.net> wrote in news:Xns95B389472C220xXxZzZxXxZzZ@
207.46.248.16:
> Yes, our webservice is already secured by an SSL cert.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> But if already using an SSL cert, why do I need to do the other?
Hi,
It depends on your needs. The digital signature ensures integrity for the
message, no matter how many points the message passes through, whereas SSL
is only point-to-point. With WSE 2.0 extensions, you can send messages
through untrusted networks securely. If you own both ends and the route in
between, it's probably much less crucial to use WSE security. Nonetheless,
I implement it because it makes the services much more extensible in the
future, since I can redeploy services and change routes without having to
maintain SSL plumbing.
-rory