Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / ASP.NET / Web Services / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fraser - 17 Sep 2004 10:33 GMT
The WS-A spec defines a single default value for the RelationshipType
attribute of a wsa:RelatesTo header, specifically wsa:Reply.

The spec further defines that the value of this attribute is a QName of type
anyURI.

We are considering using this attribute to contain an indicator of the type
of response message that is returned from a service where that service has
more than one possible outcome (e.g. business response, acknowledgement of
request, etc). So we MAY do something like :-

<wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="myNS:Ack">...</wsa:RelatesTo)

Obviously myNS: will be declared somewhere in scope.

A couple of questions :-

1. Is this legal according to the WS-A spec ?
2. Does it seem a reasonable approach (for example we could use wsa:Action
for the same purpose) ?

Cheers

Fraser.
Hervey Wilson [MSFT] - 22 Sep 2004 18:55 GMT
1. Yes, it's legal according to the specification.
2. Hard to say for sure without undestanding your scenarios more fully. As
you note, either this attribute or distinct wsa:Action values may be
appropriate dependent on the message exchange patterns that you are trying
to implement.

Signature

This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no rights.

> The WS-A spec defines a single default value for the RelationshipType
> attribute of a wsa:RelatesTo header, specifically wsa:Reply.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Fraser.
Fraser - 24 Sep 2004 08:55 GMT
Agree. I will raise a separate post to discuss the later.

Thx

Fraser.

> 1. Yes, it's legal according to the specification.
> 2. Hard to say for sure without undestanding your scenarios more fully. As
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >
> > Fraser.

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.