> > We have a mixed application that includes managed and unmanaged code.
> > Until
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> > Brandon
> That's fine for our lab environment but what if we want to remote debug a
> problem on a field machine.
>
> We develop an embedded application that runs on dedicated hardware. Our
> users are all internal but it would be very painful to be forced to insall
> Visual Studio on over 120 target systems just so we can debug a failure.
If you have a license for Visual Studio, I don't see why you can't install
just the pieces you need, in this case the DLLs.
You can also debug without the MFC debug DLLs. There are three independent
settings:
MFC DLLs are debug or release
compiler optimizations are off or on
debug symbols are generated or not
The default project settings use all the first alternatives for Debug and
all the second alternatives for Release, but for example generating debug
symbols for an optimized build using the release MFC DLLs is very possible.
>> > We have a mixed application that includes managed and unmanaged code.
>> > Until
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>
>> > Brandon
BWB - 29 Oct 2007 23:46 GMT
Ben,
Thanks for your response. I guess we could just install the dlls on the
target machines. Do you have any tips on how to install them into the SxS
folder? Can they just be copied there? Do they need a special manifest?
Brandon
> > That's fine for our lab environment but what if we want to remote debug a
> > problem on a field machine.
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >>
> >> > Brandon