> Hi Everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> external symbol, it simply means that I'm missing a .lib from my
> project settings.
It can mean you have the wrong .lib file (e.g. a different, incompatible
version), rather than a missing one.
In this case, I would think that adding msvcrt.lib
> to the project would fix it, but it does not. I tried compiling this
> both with and without default libraries with the same result.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Any ideas?
Try changing the runtime library setting under
Project->Settings->C/C++->Code Generation (IIRC). The setting must match
that which the lib file was generated against.
Generally, you should not need to use the no default libraries setting.
Instead, you just need to make sure that the library settings match. See
also here:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f6xx1b1z(vs.71).aspx
Tom
walkerfx - 16 Apr 2007 12:06 GMT
On Apr 16, 2:42 am, "Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_use...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Tom
Thank you Tom, that is helpful information. I was finally able to
isolate the problem. It comes down to code that calls a static member
method of a class from a 3rd party library. It looks like this:
class::method(&id);
If I comment out the line, the link errors go away. I'm not sure how
to fix it though.
I have looked at my Code Generation settings as you suggested and they
are set the same as the example projects which build fine
(multithreaded DLL). I tried some different settings but they result
in another set of link errors. I have read through the LNK2001 page
you sent but it does not give any insight into static class methods,
only C style static variables and functions.
Masterchief - 16 Apr 2007 13:39 GMT
Have you also linked the third party lib?
What you describe is exactly the error you get when you use a function from
another lib and don´t link it.
Ronny
> On Apr 16, 2:42 am, "Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_use...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> you sent but it does not give any insight into static class methods,
> only C style static variables and functions.
walkerfx - 16 Apr 2007 21:55 GMT
> Have you also linked the third party lib?
> What you describe is exactly the error you get when you use a function from
> another lib and don´t link it.
>
> Ronny
Thanks Ronny. I went and checked again just to make sure. There are
only two 3rd party libraries to use and I have them both. Well there
is also a third MFC-flavored lib, but I am not using MFC and building
with that version doesn't make a difference.
I have never built a lib that exports C++ static methods, so I'm not
sure how they differ from plain C functions. It seems somewhat
arbitrary or at least esoteric that the link error is with __cdecl new
and delete caused by using a class that has nothing but static methods
in it. It's at least showing me an area I have some things to learn
about ;-)
Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP] - 16 Apr 2007 15:36 GMT
> On Apr 16, 2:42 am, "Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_use...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __ftol2
I've just noticed, that is a VC7 function, not a VC6 one, I think! You
need to get a version of the 3rd party library for VC6 - you've got the
VC7 version.
If there isn't one, you could try adding this code to a .cpp:
extern "C" long _ftol( double ); //defined by VC6 C libs
extern "C" long _ftol2( double dblSource ) { return _ftol( dblSource );}
That leaves the new[]/delete[] errors. To fix those, you could try
adding a call to new[] and delete[] to your code, if you don't already
have any.
Tom
walkerfx - 16 Apr 2007 21:46 GMT
On Apr 16, 7:36 am, "Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_use...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2:42 am, "Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_use...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Tom
Yes, I believe you are right. I had read a discussion on another list
about the _ftol function with the same conclusion, doing a manual
'reroute' as you suggest.
The documentation for the libraries says that they can be used in
either VC6 or 7, though perhaps this is an oversight or nuance in VC6.
I have contacted the developers to get their help. At this point, I
can omit the code in question and move on and come back to it later.
Hopefully they have some idea of what is wrong.
Thanks for all your help!