 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / Languages / Managed C++ / June 2005VC++2005 equivalent code of partial C# keyword
Hello in C# : Partial type definitions allow the definition of a class, struct or interface to be split into multiple files. I'd like to have the equivalent keyword of partial in VC++ does someone has an idea? Thanks in advance > Hello > in C# : Partial type definitions allow the definition of a class, struct or > interface to be split into multiple files. > I'd like to have the equivalent keyword of partial in VC++ > does someone has an idea? You can only split the definition of a class' member functions over as many file as you like. The class itself needs to be defined in one piece. > Thanks in advance Schobi  SignatureSpamTrap@gmx.de is never read I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org "Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving" Terry Pratchett I want an equivalent to "partial" keyword > I want an equivalent to "partial" keyword Which I don't know. Schobi SignatureSpamTrap@gmx.de is never read I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org "Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving" Terry Pratchett > Hello > in C# : Partial type definitions allow the definition of a class, > struct or interface to be split into multiple files. > I'd like to have the equivalent keyword of partial in VC++ > does someone has an idea? > Thanks in advance There is no equivalent. -cd > Hello > in C# : Partial type definitions allow the definition of a class, struct [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > does someone has an idea? > Thanks in advance Hmmmm in what context would you like this? Meaning, why exactly you want to split a class definition in multiple .h files? You could always play with the preprocessor, I believe! ClassX.h: --------Cut here -------------- class X { public: void f1(); void f2(); void f3(); #include "classX2.h" --------Cut here -------------- ClassX2.h: --------Cut here -------------- void f4(); void f5(); #include "classX3.h" --------Cut here -------------- ClassX3.h: --------Cut here -------------- private: void f6(); int a,b,c; } --------Cut here -------------- But I don't easily see an advantage on doing this and wouldn't recommend it. Fabro Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.