 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / Languages / Managed C++ / March 2005IL & C++ & OBJ
I am compiled my C file into IL source, How i can compile this file back to OBJ file, not to EXE or DLL? or, can i compile to OBJ file VB or C# code and link them with C++ managed OBJ files? Thanks >I am compiled my C file into IL source, > How i can compile this file back to OBJ file, not to EXE or DLL? There is no tool from MS to accomplish this. > or, can i compile to OBJ file VB or C# code and link them with C++ managed > OBJ files? AFAIK, no tool for this, either. <rant> It is a shame that you can't currently do this especially since VAX/VMS allowed modules written in disparate languages to be linked and used together seamlessly more than two decades ago. </rant> It is not what you asked, but it is possible to link to "net modules" and then to create an "assembly" from net nodules. I've not tried it, but I _think_ that the C# and VB.Net compilers are capable of creating netmodules. Regards, Will Generally i wrote completly new project and want write it in one language, but - i need MC++ to interact with native code - MC++ have few restrictions and stranges so i can't use only C++ (( may be third party tools? C++ can generate managed OBJ files which link links it is very strange that asm can not be compiled into OBJ instead of C++ >>I am compiled my C file into IL source, >> How i can compile this file back to OBJ file, not to EXE or DLL? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Regards, > Will > - i need MC++ to interact with native code This is what it does best. > - MC++ have few restrictions and stranges so i can't use only C++ (( Hmm, what do you mean? > it is very strange that asm can not be compiled into OBJ instead of C++ Without going in to great detail, why don't you explain exactly what you need to do? Together, MC++'s "It just works" which allows mixing native and managed code in the same MC++ module - and Platform/Invoke which permits invocation of external functions in unmanaged DLLs provide a lot of capability. Regards, Will >> - MC++ have few restrictions and stranges so i can't use only C++ (( > > Hmm, what do you mean? > >> it is very strange that asm can not be compiled into OBJ instead of C++ - i already wrote this as separate message to this group System.TypeLoadException: Method GetObjectData in type MyProj.Runtime.NativeHandle from assembly MyProj.Runtime does not have an implementation. without reasonable motive - can't code private inheritance of interface class MyClass :private IMyInterface, but when IMyIterface marked as private its defenition is absent in assembly metadata, but inheritance still stays public - assembly fails to load (( not so huge - cant implement interface with property name == class name - can't directly override Finalize, when implementing ~__dtor compiler makes reference to MSVCRT71, i don't want install to clients this dll only because of dtors (C# and VB dont use __CxxUnwind ... ) - cant mark native class as public or private, strange, but native classes becames public - the same with all native data types or functions. - i understand why MS need describe them in metadata, but why public ? ((( and many small issues, even dont want to recall > - i already wrote this as separate message to this group > System.TypeLoadException: Method GetObjectData in type [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > and many small issues, even dont want to recall Probably my problem but I have no idea what the heck you are talking about. I'll bow out of this thread now ... Regards, Will >>I am compiled my C file into IL source, >>How i can compile this file back to OBJ file, not to EXE or DLL? > > There is no tool from MS to accomplish this. I think that he probably meant compiled in mixed mode, and I think this can be done by using extern "C" inside a C++ file and then compile the whole thing with /clr. > I think that he probably meant compiled in mixed mode, and I think this > can be done by using extern "C" inside a C++ file and then compile the > whole thing with /clr. Could be, which is why I mentioned IJW and asked for more details. The only thing that is clear is that his "compile back" is at least a problematic usage of the language if not a problematic request in its own right. :-) Regards. Will Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.