I'd actually like that... if it wasn't for the wince variation of mfc.

not only that, but form the way MSDN is composed, you'd think that Microsoft
does not want anyone to use STL.

- classes do not show up on the index tab (try finding string class for
example)
- members are listed on different pages
- nowhere do they have a listing of the different exceptions that can be
trown by each method. I mean, WTF? how am i supposed to handle exceptions if
i don't even know what i can expect?
the only thing i can do is browse through the actual header files and check
what each message does.
and believe me, trying to read and understand the STL headers does not make
your day.
- function descriptions, and especially constructor descriptions are
extremely terse.

it seems they spent as little time as possible on the STL documentation,
instead promoting their own MFC cruft.

   Bruno.