Frank,
> I have the following code:
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> Does this mean I cannot have pointer to memberfunction for managed code? Or
> is there another way I can have a pointer to memberfunction?
There are delegates for managed code, which are a more clean and the
preferable alternative.
Why do you need a pointer to the member function?

Signature
Tomas Restrepo
tomasr@mvps.org
Frank Vanris - 04 Mar 2005 15:53 GMT
Delegates! I didn't know that. Thanks.
The reason I wanted to use pointer to memberfunction was that I wanted to
use the boost library, especially the bind functions which accept a pointer
to memberfunction.
I will try to use the delegates instead.
Frank.
> Frank,
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Why do you need a pointer to the member function?