Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / Languages / Managed C++ / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

dotnet framework 2.0

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bonj - 15 Oct 2004 18:33 GMT
If I download the 2005 beta express versions and install them, will the .NET
framework 2.0 (beta) replace the existing 1.1 (non-beta) that's on my
machine? What I mean is will I have two versions side by side - i.e. is the
beta marked as 'this version is not allowed to replace an existing one' but
a non-beta isn't marked with that, is what I'm trying to get at.

And if 1.1 is installed over the top of 1.0, then does it replace it, and if
so, does an application developed with 1.0 still run against 1.1? When 2.0
(non-beta) is out, will it then replace 1.1 and will 1.1 applications still
run against it?

Thanks
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] - 15 Oct 2004 18:40 GMT
Bonj,

   No, they will not replace each other.  The versions of the framework
(even the betas) all have different version ids, and run side-by-side.

   Hope this helps.

Signature

              - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
              - mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

> If I download the 2005 beta express versions and install them, will the
> .NET framework 2.0 (beta) replace the existing 1.1 (non-beta) that's on my
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks
Bonj - 15 Oct 2004 21:21 GMT
So if I take an application developed against 1.0 and run it on a computer
that has already got 1.1, but don't install 1.0 aswell, will the app still
run?

> Bonj,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Thanks
SpongeBob SquarePants - 16 Oct 2004 03:34 GMT
I believe you need 1.0 installed to run a 1.0 developed app.

Signature

"SpongeBob SquarePants"
"Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?"

Small Note:  If you want to learn how to fix/do something, I'll point you to
it, but if you want me to do your work for you, it will cost you $50 USD per
hour - your choice.

> So if I take an application developed against 1.0 and run it on a computer
> that has already got 1.1, but don't install 1.0 aswell, will the app still
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>>
>>> Thanks
Robert Rolls - 16 Oct 2004 10:47 GMT
should just work

> So if I take an application developed against 1.0 and run it on a computer
> that has already got 1.1, but don't install 1.0 aswell, will the app still
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >>
> >> Thanks
Bonj - 17 Oct 2004 21:46 GMT
Anybody else to have the decider? It's one a-piece...
Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP] - 17 Oct 2004 22:09 GMT
> Anybody else to have the decider? It's one a-piece...

A 1.0 app should work with the 1.1 or 2.0 runtime.  YMMV.  Just as as app
designed for Windows 95 should normally run on XP, sometimes it doesn't.

-cd

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.