Hello,

I have a class with three overloaded indexed poperties.

Declaration in  *.h

__gc class ByteArrayN : public FArrayN
{
    typedef BYTE T;
    typedef ByteArrayN FTArrayN;
    .
    .
    __property T get_At(int ind1);           
    __property T set_At(int ind1,T value);               
    __property T get_At(int ind2,int ind1);
    __property T set_At(int ind2,int ind1,T value);           
    __property T get_At(int ind3,int ind2,int ind1);
    __property T set_At(int ind3,int ind2,int ind1,T value);
    .
    .
};

And in the *.cpp file

typedef ByteArrayN FTArrayN;
typedef BYTE T;

inline T FTArrayN::get_At(int ind1) { return ...}
inline T FTArrayN::set_At(int ind1,T value) {return ...}
inline T FTArrayN::get_At(int ind2,int ind1){return ...}
inline T FTArrayN::set_At(int ind2,int ind1,T value){return ...}
inline T FTArrayN::get_At(int ind3,int ind2,int ind1){return ...}
inline T FTArrayN::set_At(int ind3,int ind2,int ind1,T value){return ...}

inline FComplexN FTArrayN::GetFComplexAt(int ind3,int ind2,int ind1)
{
    return (FComplexN)At[ ind3,ind2,ind1 ];
}

the above row At[ ind3,ind2,ind1 ] always call the function get_At[ ind 1 ].

The alternativ syntax At[ind3][ind2][ind1] works absolutly correct.

Is this a bug or am I wrong?

The language spec tell me, that both forms of syntax are allowed in MC++.

Michael Geier