> is there any performance diffrence between MC++ 2003 ,other .NET
> languages and MC++ 2005 (cause of an optimization) ???
Probably. But it's too early to tell - we're still a year away from RTM for
VS.NET 2005 and the 2.0 framework - and performance tuning work frequently
is saved for the end of the development cycle.
I'd speculate that it's unlikely that 2005 languages will be dramatically
faster, but I know, for example, that in native (not managed) C++, the
compiler does have significant new optimization technology that can result
in gains of 30% (10% is more typical).
-cd
thanks for help.
by native you mean without /clr parameter which produces binary
executable...
Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP] - 01 May 2004 19:12 GMT
> thanks for help.
>
> by native you mean without /clr parameter
correct.
-cd