If you look at how long VB has been supported (through all of its
incarnations, from VB3), you will see that its a considerable period of time
(in computing terms). In fact, VB6 is still supported, even though VB.NET
has been out for some years. Moreover (and this point is just as
important), regardless of whether VB.NET remains supported, by learning
VB.NET, you will pick up .NET framework experience, which is transferrable
to the other languages in the .NET suite (C# for instance).
> Do we have any idea how long VBNet is going to be supported?
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> KT
CJ Taylor - 26 Oct 2004 13:12 GMT
Continuing what Robin said. Microsoft is making a huge shift towards .NET
and making it the foundation for other products. If you look at Longhorn,
.NET is an integral part of the operating system, so given that is expected
out in 2006 (I think) and WinFX (2007) has the same plans, I would expect
.NET to be around for a long long time. Especially long enough for you to
justify spending the $10 that express editions are supposed to cost (I'm not
sure on that price, but I've just heard from others it's not going to cost
much at all).
I personally think (as a hobbyist in many forms) that the 700 dollars a
professional edition costs of VS, or even the ~200 the Standard edition
costs is well worth the money. I have other hobbies that cost a LOT more
per year than that.
Just my 2 cents...
-CJ
> If you look at how long VB has been supported (through all of its
> incarnations, from VB3), you will see that its a considerable period of time
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >
> > KT
A Traveler - 26 Oct 2004 15:26 GMT
Plus, i wouldnt worry about the learning curve so much. If youre
programming, chances are youre reasonably bright, and so it really shouldnt
be that much trouble to learn the move from VB to VB.NET
> If you look at how long VB has been supported (through all of its
> incarnations, from VB3), you will see that its a considerable period of
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> KT
> Do we have any idea how long VBNet is going to be supported?
fwiw, VB.Net (the name) is already obsolete. They've dropped the .Net
part from their next release.

Signature
Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
Please keep all discussions in the groups..
CJ Taylor - 26 Oct 2004 19:18 GMT
Waht does this have to do with the life expetancy of the product? It's
still .NET under the hood... and will be for quite some time if you read
Microsoft's Roadmaps... at this point, they have no intention of dropping
the .NET framework, just making it stronger
Until of course google sneaks in and takes over the world some how with
their crafty simple products...
> > Do we have any idea how long VBNet is going to be supported?
>
> fwiw, VB.Net (the name) is already obsolete. They've dropped the .Net
> part from their next release.
Ken Halter - 27 Oct 2004 18:17 GMT
> Waht does this have to do with the life expetancy of the product? It's
> still .NET under the hood... and will be for quite some time if you read
> Microsoft's Roadmaps... at this point, they have no intention of dropping
> the .NET framework, just making it stronger
The framework... yes, B#, maybe. It's still a "toy language" as far as
MS is concerned.

Signature
Ken Halter - MS-MVP-VB - http://www.vbsight.com
Please keep all discussions in the groups..
Larry Serflaten - 27 Oct 2004 21:52 GMT
> > Waht does this have to do with the life expetancy of the product? It's
> > still .NET under the hood... and will be for quite some time if you read
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The framework... yes, B#, maybe. It's still a "toy language" as far as
> MS is concerned.
Have you got a cite you can point to, or is that your own opinion?
LFS
CJ Taylor - 27 Oct 2004 22:16 GMT
> > The framework... yes, B#, maybe. It's still a "toy language" as far as
> > MS is concerned.
>
> Have you got a cite you can point to, or is that your own opinion?
>
> LFS
ACK
I don't remember MS ever promoting it as a toy language. Given it has
almost identical functionality to C#. Sure C# has some cool features VB
doesn't, but then again, VB has some cool features C# doesn't.
If its a toy language, then I make a hell of a lot of money for getting to
"play".
> Do we have any idea how long VBNet is going to be supported?
No. How can anyone but the people at MSFT know for sure?
What we can expect, is that, like VB6, even after it life expectancy
has expired, the programs will still, (more or less) run on whatever
the next platform will be.
Due to the heavy investment MSFT is putting into including .Net
in their other offereings, it is a safe bet, they plan to keep that code
working for quite a while... How long is a while? Its anyone's guess!
LFS