Even though it's quite common to use only the public key when using strong
name evidence, other parts of the strong name can also be used when
constructing strong name membership conditions or identity permission
demands. Since it's possible to vary permission grants based on strong name
without varying the signing key, potential policy use probably shouldn't be
a factor when selecting a signing key.
"Joe Kaplan (MVP - ADSI)" <joseph.e.kaplan@removethis.accenture.com> wrote
> The only reason I can think of that you might want different strong names
> would be to apply different security policies to different assemblies and
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>> Thanks.
>>> Ryan
Ryan Taylor - 24 May 2005 13:14 GMT
Thanks guys. Seems to be unanimous.
Ryan
> Even though it's quite common to use only the public key when using strong
> name evidence, other parts of the strong name can also be used when
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Ryan