Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / .NET SDK / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Which version shall I use? Visual studio .NET or 6.0?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Berka - 26 Aug 2004 07:07 GMT
Can I under no circumstance build an application in Visual studio .NET 2003
unmanaged  to work on a computer without the framework .NET? Or is there any
dependencies between the compiled program and the framework? Or is the Visual
Studio 6.0 better to use. The program is written in Visual C++.

Thanks!
Paul Mason - 26 Aug 2004 07:46 GMT
> Can I under no circumstance build an application in Visual studio .NET 2003
> unmanaged  to work on a computer without the framework .NET? Or is there any
> dependencies between the compiled program and the framework? Or is the Visual
> Studio 6.0 better to use. The program is written in Visual C++.
>
> Thanks!

You can still write unmanaged C++ applications with VS.NET 2003.  The only
thing missing is unmanaged VB.
Berka - 26 Aug 2004 08:11 GMT
So there is no dependencies between the compiled program and the .NET
framework?

> > Can I under no circumstance build an application in Visual studio .NET
> 2003
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> You can still write unmanaged C++ applications with VS.NET 2003.  The only
> thing missing is unmanaged VB.
Ary Sulistyono - 26 Aug 2004 09:10 GMT
As long as you're not using the .Net class libraries.

Ary

> So there is no dependencies between the compiled program and the .NET
> framework?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>You can still write unmanaged C++ applications with VS.NET 2003.  The only
>>thing missing is unmanaged VB.
Girish Bharadwaj - 14 Sep 2004 20:25 GMT
As long as you build your C++ programs without "/clr" option, you are
unmanaged. Do note that the CRT and MFC library dlls have changed. So, you
will need to ship the newer ones if you are going to use those libraries.

Signature

Girish Bharadwaj
http://msmvps.com/gbvb

> So there is no dependencies between the compiled program and the .NET
> framework?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > You can still write unmanaged C++ applications with VS.NET 2003.  The only
> > thing missing is unmanaged VB.

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.