Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / .NET SDK / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ILASM is not able to assemble large IL files

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Shripal Meghani - 23 Jan 2004 07:06 GMT
Hi,
1) I tried to assemble a very large IL file (~290 MB), and ILASM was not able to read any tokens after a certain point! Instead giving a syntax error on an incomplete token.
Is there any solution available for this problem?
2) why was the "owner" option removed from the ILASM beta? It would have been useful to prevent reverse engineering of code...

regards
Shripal Meghani
Richard A. Lowe - 23 Jan 2004 07:46 GMT
Well I won't speak for the tool, but 290 MB seems pretty excessive.
Assuming there's just a lot of classes in there, there's no good reason to
have all that in one Assembly (if you have that much 'internal' access
between classes, I'd suggest there's a design issue).  Can you not just
compile multiple assemblies?

R.

Signature

C#, .NET and Complex Adaptive Systems:
http://blogs.geekdojo.net/Richard

> Hi,
> 1) I tried to assemble a very large IL file (~290 MB), and ILASM was not able to read any tokens after a certain point! Instead giving a syntax error
on an incomplete token.
> Is there any solution available for this problem?
> 2) why was the "owner" option removed from the ILASM beta? It would have been useful to prevent reverse engineering of code...
>
> regards
> Shripal Meghani
mikeb - 23 Jan 2004 15:10 GMT
> Hi,
> 1) I tried to assemble a very large IL file (~290 MB), and ILASM was not able to read any tokens after a certain point! Instead giving a syntax error on an incomplete token.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> regards
> Shripal Meghani

I can't speak to the large file issue, but the "owner" option was
removed simply because it really provided no security, only the
*appearance* of security.  The IL was still openly available to any
tool.  It was up to the tool to enforce the flag.

Signature

mikeb

Michael Giagnocavo [MVP] - 24 Jan 2004 00:34 GMT
What's the scenario for 290MB of IL?

Also, the owner option was pointless -- it's so easy to get around, all it'd
do is give people a false sense of security.

-mike

> Hi,
> 1) I tried to assemble a very large IL file (~290 MB), and ILASM was not able to read any tokens after a certain point! Instead giving a syntax error
on an incomplete token.
> Is there any solution available for this problem?
> 2) why was the "owner" option removed from the ILASM beta? It would have been useful to prevent reverse engineering of code...
>
> regards
> Shripal Meghani

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.