Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / .NET SDK / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Installing .NET 1.1 SDK on a machine with .NET framework 2.0 already installed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Morphcore - 04 Jul 2006 17:07 GMT
Hello,

I wanted to install Borland Developer Studio 2006 on my PC, which has
the .NET framework 2.0 (x64) already installed. But before the
installation started the Borland installer required the .NET 1.1 SDK to
be installed. So I'm a little reluctant towards installing the .NET 1.1
SDK while already having the .NET framework 2.0 installed on my system.
Is there anybody who can tell me if this is possible to do? or will
there be conflicts between these versions?

Thanks in advance.
simsen - 05 Jul 2006 06:28 GMT
Hi,

> Is there anybody who can tell me if this is possible to do? or will
> there be conflicts between these versions?

I have the two versions installed on my computer whitout any conflicts. I
can run them both without any problems. But I don't know if there should be
any conflicts when you install 1.1 above 2.0. I did it the other way - first
1.1 and then 2.0

regards,

simsen

> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance.
Morphcore - 05 Jul 2006 09:29 GMT
Thanks for your reply,

so you have the 1.1 SDK and the 2.0 Framework running on your machine.
(note the difference between the SDK and framework)
If so I will give it a try.

Regards.

simsen schreef:

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
Morphcore - 05 Jul 2006 14:01 GMT
Ok after doing some thorough research on the web I found some topics
indicatiing that it should be possible to have both frameworks
installed alongside eachother, it's a shame microsoft doesn't provide
such information on the web.
But I gave it a try and it is all working correctly now, so my question
is answered.
Morphcore schreef:

> Thanks for your reply,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
Christian Schönig - 06 Jul 2006 08:32 GMT
Hi,

they are running side by side. If a application needs 1.1. CLR 1.1 is used
and the same for 2.0.
There are minor differences which came up in our project. They may be not
valid for You, but have a look at:
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/Workaround.aspx?FeedbackID=93820 !
If You install 1.1 after 2.0 it may not change the behavoir You are used to
right now.

Chris

> Ok after doing some thorough research on the web I found some topics
> indicatiing that it should be possible to have both frameworks
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
Jason Sacks [MSFT] - 06 Jul 2006 18:01 GMT
I believe that each release of the Framework is an add-on to the previous
version, and therefore you can install .NET Framework 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0
(formerly called WinFX) in any order.

> Ok after doing some thorough research on the web I found some topics
> indicatiing that it should be possible to have both frameworks
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>> > >
>> > > Thanks in advance.

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.