
Signature
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> To use the generated .xml file for use with the IntelliSense feature, let
> the file name of the .xml file be the same as the assembly you want to
> support and then make sure the .xml file is in the same directory as the
> assembly. Thus, when the assembly is referenced in the Visual Studio
> project, the .xml file is found as well.
Seems like a really bad design, actually. Why isn't there just a check
box that says something like "generate xml to support Intellisense"?
Then we wouldn't have people using VS for months or years before they
figure out how to get XML Doc to work across assemblies.
If there IS really some valid reason to name the XML something besides
assemblyName.xml, then the check box could be a radio button, and the
other alternatives would be "don't generate XML doc" and "generate XML
doc under weird name", which would be next to the weird name text box
....

Signature
<http://www.midnightbeach.com>
"Peter Huang" [MSFT] - 27 Jan 2006 02:22 GMT
Hi
The XML commnents is firstly introduced in Visual C# 2003.
In addition to Intellisense, XML Comments will be used to build help file
and so on.
Based on my test, the Intellisense will be improved in the Whidbey version,
VS.NET 2005.
You may have a try.
Best regards,
Peter Huang
Microsoft Online Partner Support

Signature
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.