I don't get it.. Didn't Microsoft end JScript?
Why is it considered a DotNet language?
Is this different than JSharp?
Either way-- MS doesn't do java any more right?
Can we get this group archived?
THanks
-Aaron
> I don't get it.. Didn't Microsoft end JScript?
Nope.
> Why is it considered a DotNet language?
Because MS have provided JScript.NET which extends the original JScript and
has provided a compilier that creates IL code from it.
> Is this different than JSharp?
Yes. JSharp was intended to be Java compatible however MS have dropped it.
> Either way-- MS doesn't do java any more right?
Right it doesn't
> Can we get this group archived?
I can't see any reason for that apart from the limited traffic here.

Signature
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET
Aaron,
JScript has become the defacto language for web browsers, beating out
VBScript on the client side. MS has even enhanced the JScript integration
in VS 2008 to include debugging scripts.
Mike Ober.
>I don't get it.. Didn't Microsoft end JScript?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> -Aaron
GeoffMcGrath - 28 Mar 2008 20:17 GMT
> JScript has become the defacto language for web browsers, beating out
> VBScript on the client side. MS has even enhanced the JScript integration
> in VS 2008 to include debugging scripts.
Uhm....there is a difference between JScript.NET and classic
"JScript," the client-side interpreted language which is Microsoft's
implimentation of the language that began as LiveScript and is
currently designated ECMAScript.
Besides syntatical differences, the core of the matter is JScript.NET
is compiled into IL (Intermediate Language) that is run within
the .NET runtime.
While Microsoft continues to provide coding examples in JScript.NET in
their documentation, they have not fully integrated language support
for JScript.NET into their world-class IDE (VS2008), signalling to
many people that JScript.NET is not the language to use for new
development.