Me too. virus probably scans ms ngs for more names, local hd, etc.
Ive been swamped with this as well. Anyone have a decent rule for
outlook they want to share? hehe

Signature
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- nicholas.paldino@exisconsulting.com
> Me too. virus probably scans ms ngs for more names, local hd, etc.
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> > ?2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy
> > Statement | Accessibility
Kieran Benton - 19 Sep 2003 14:43 GMT
Fraid not Nic, seems pretty random to me. Tried tracing the IPs from the
header but it appears its pretty well spoofed. Grrr. This is really doing my
head in, why dont people just patch their machines?
Kieran
> Ive been swamped with this as well. Anyone have a decent rule for
> outlook they want to share? hehe
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> Privacy
> > > Statement | Accessibility
Pete - 22 Sep 2003 20:48 GMT
Hi,
> Fraid not Nic, seems pretty random to me. Tried tracing the IPs from
> the header but it appears its pretty well spoofed. Grrr. This is
> really doing my head in, why dont people just patch their machines?
Why not just filter out message bodies containing "September 2003,
Cumulative Patch".. it seems to work fine for me. I'm also filtering out
mail with "Undelivered" or "Undeliverable" to catch those ones too (although
I realise I won't get any valid undeliverable messages now).
-- Pete
Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook] - 19 Sep 2003 17:55 GMT
Nicholas,
I check for message headers that contain Client, Partner, User, Customer,
Consumer, recipient, Recipient, or Receiver. Except if I am in the To or CC
fields. I move them to the Junk E-mail folder, and then I scan the list and
delete them.
Hope this helps
Jay
> Ive been swamped with this as well. Anyone have a decent rule for
> outlook they want to share? hehe
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> Privacy
> > > Statement | Accessibility