Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / Interop / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

COM & static member function

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gk - 31 Aug 2006 22:17 GMT
Hi,

in a .NET class I wish to use from a COM client, I have a static member
function "LoadFromFile" that returns an instance of that class:

class Myclass : MyclassCOMinterface
{
    static Myclass LoadFromFile(string file) {...}
}

since static members are not visible by COM, how can I expose
"LoadFromFile"? Or is there another solution?

thanks for help

gk
Mattias Sjögren - 03 Sep 2006 02:20 GMT
>since static members are not visible by COM, how can I expose
>"LoadFromFile"? Or is there another solution?

Provide another class with an instance method that calls the static
method. Something like

class MyclassFactory
{
    public Myclass LoadFromFile(string file)
    {
        return Myclass.LoadFromFile(file);
    }
}

or use Reflection from the COM client. Static methods can't be exposed
directly to COM.

Mattias

Signature

Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP]  mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

gk - 05 Sep 2006 16:13 GMT
>> since static members are not visible by COM, how can I expose
>> "LoadFromFile"? Or is there another solution?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Mattias

ok thanks for the advice.

another problem showed up:

The factory returns a MyClass object. In my project, MyClass implements
2 interfaces. When I run the LoadFromFile method, it returns the default
interface, but not the object itself. This means I cannot access the
second interface. Is this normal behaviour?

gk

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.