> Hello. have you thought about pinvoke? or is this not possible? take a
> look at this:
>
> http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/COM-Tech/complus/managed/article.php/c3947/
Hello Clement.
Sorry...I didn't understand what you really wnated on the 1st post. However,
in your case, there's another solution which is documented on this article:
http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/bridge.asp
I think that this approach is more eficient that wrapping the objects in
COM. hope it helps.

Signature
---
Regards,
Luis Abreu
http://weblogs.pontonetpt.com/luisabreu
http://www.pontonetpt.com
> > Hello. have you thought about pinvoke? or is this not possible? take a
> > look at this:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks for the help anyway.
Luis Abreu - 09 Oct 2004 11:57 GMT
oh, another thing? if want to call them from unmanaged code, why don't you
build a mixed (i think that this is the right name) c++ component (one that
has support for .net)?

Signature
---
Regards,
Luis Abreu
http://weblogs.pontonetpt.com/luisabreu
http://www.pontonetpt.com
> Hello Clement.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > > Hello. have you thought about pinvoke? or is this not possible? take a
> > > look at this:
http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/COM-Tech/complus/managed/article.php/c3947/
> > Well, my goal is to access C# functions from C++ code, while pInvoke
> > seems to be made to access c++ code (in dll) from .NET (c#) applications.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > Thanks for the help anyway.