Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / General / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How importand to you think XAML is?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brent - 24 Nov 2006 01:40 GMT
OK i downloaded the new/addon framework 3 and downloaded the VS 2005 addon.
I started with XAML. So far im like mehhhhhhhh. Anyone else have the same
opinion? When i first heard about xaml i got excited as you could put a lot
of 3d effects in your apps. Who is with me in thinking that xaml is kind of
green right now. Maybe tools will be added in the future that will make it
an excellent technology but right now its not that great. There are so many
great technoligies in .Net now and its very hard to profficient in all of
them. Who thinks (unless you have special needs) that effort learning xaml
should wait until better tools are available and your learning should be
applied elsewhere. I just have so many things i want to learn. From
technologies in SQL Server 2005 to programming paradigms like Extreme
Programming using NUnit. I was curious of everyones opinions.

thanks,
Brent
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] - 24 Nov 2006 07:28 GMT
> OK i downloaded the new/addon framework 3 and downloaded the VS 2005 addon.
> I started with XAML. So far im like mehhhhhhhh. Anyone else have the same
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> technologies in SQL Server 2005 to programming paradigms like Extreme
> Programming using NUnit. I was curious of everyones opinions.

XAML looks lilke a fabulous technology to me. One of my main interests
in it is to allow designers to write out their results in a way which
is hand-editable and then *still* designer-editable. Designers are
awful at writing code, IMO, but I don't see any reason why they
shouldn't write reasonable XAML.

Signature

Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Kevin Spencer - 24 Nov 2006 14:24 GMT
Hi Brent,

Not being able to see something is not the same thing as its' not being
there, and I can certainly understand why you (and others) have trouble
understanding the power and potential of XAML. Here are a couple of good
articles that may shed some light on the subject:

http://searchvb.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid8_gci1213781,00.html
http://eclipse.sys-con.com/read/47671.htm

Signature

HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Ministry of Software Development
http://unclechutney.blogspot.com

Never trust a dunderhead with a blunderbuss.

> OK i downloaded the new/addon framework 3 and downloaded the VS 2005
> addon. I started with XAML. So far im like mehhhhhhhh. Anyone else have
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> thanks,
> Brent
Michael Nemtsev - 25 Nov 2006 14:38 GMT
Hello Brent,

B> OK i downloaded the new/addon framework 3 and downloaded the VS 2005
B> addon. I started with XAML. So far im like mehhhhhhhh. Anyone else
B> have the same opinion? When i first heard about xaml i got excited as
B> you could put a lot of 3d effects in your apps. Who is with me in
B> thinking that xaml is kind of green right now. Maybe tools will be
B> added in the future that will make it an excellent technology but
B> right now its not that great.

It's great as technology, but it's too young.
Many steps were undertaked to support XAML - there are flash2xaml converters,
adobe editors export to xaml, xaml editors, and etc. It only needs time to
be popular.

B> There are so many great technoligies in
B> .Net now and its very hard to profficient in all of them. Who thinks
B> (unless you have special needs) that effort learning xaml should wait
B> until better tools are available and your learning should be applied
B> elsewhere.

the same things can be said about anything else :)
for example about SQL2005 :) because there are majority of Oracle/SQL2000
DBs around

The current problem of XAML is intertwined with .NET 3.0 so to use it (or
XBAP) your client needs to have .NET 3.0

So just wait to see that XAML be popular and it becames more popular when
WPF/E will be released, coz it allows to build your webApps without .NET
3.0 on your client machine

---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.