Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / General / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Coverage of .net amongst home users

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Matt - 23 Nov 2006 12:59 GMT
Hi,

I'm looking to put a CD together with a small application that runs
straight from the disk without a separate install. I would like to use
C#.

How many Windows users can be expected to have .net these days? Was it
included mandatorily in any service packs or updates? Which version
should I target if any?

The posts I can find on this are quite old so I thought it was best to
ask the question again.

Thanks,
Matt
Michael Nemtsev - 23 Nov 2006 21:39 GMT
Hello Matt,

M> I'm looking to put a CD together with a small application that runs
M> straight from the disk without a separate install. I would like to
M> use C#.
M>
M> How many Windows users can be expected to have .net these days? Was
M> it included mandatorily in any service packs or updates?

It's hard to tell exactly, it can vary depending on the target group. Win
Developers for example in general have the latest updates and tools, but
home users may have no .net at all.

BTW, .net started with windows shipping (Server R2) only a year ago, and
for other windows .NET is distributed as update (which not always can be
installed)

M> Which version should I target if any?

Which suites you the best :)

M> The posts I can find on this are quite old so I thought it was best
M> to ask the question again.
---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsch
PS - 24 Nov 2006 22:52 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> The posts I can find on this are quite old so I thought it was best to
> ask the question again.

This is a common question and the best answer is "not 100%". So this means
that if you have an application that requires the .Net framework then you
will definitely have users where the framework will need to be installed.
It's pretty much going to be luck of the draw because any figure like "67%
of Windows XP machines have .Net 1.1 framework installed" means nothing when
by chance 98% of the people installing your application happen to be in the
33% that don't have the framework installed. So without sounding harsh
either 1) handle the installation when the .Net framework is not installed
or 2) use another development environment.

PS

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.