 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / .NET Framework / General / June 2005Is this possible .Net 2.0?
I wrote a win app in .net 2.0 c#. I would like to demo this on my client's machine but it is not possible to install the .net framework 2.0 beta on his machine. Is it possible to pick the nessesary dll assembly files and compile them into my .exe file? or is there another way to accomplish this? btw the machine has .net 1.1 and 1.0 installed Thanks, Aaron Aaron, There is an in my idea awful method (and software) posible to add parts of the Net as in the past was done with by instance the different versions of the VB runtimers. Is it a kind of Hell you want to introduce that is even worse as the so called DLL Hell? Just my thought, Cor Aaron, I forgot to tell. By malfunction from the computer of your clients after doing it, it is probably in many parts of the world not impossible that he can bring you to judge and will succeed if there is the slightest malfunctioning of any program because of what you are doing. Just my thought, Cor >Is it possible to pick the nessesary dll assembly files and compile them >into my .exe file? No. >or is there another way to accomplish this? > >btw the machine has .net 1.1 and 1.0 installed Port it back to v1.x of the framework then? Mattias  SignatureMattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com Please reply only to the newsgroup. Why don't you simply ship the .NET framework along with your app? > I wrote a win app in .net 2.0 c#. I would like to demo this on my client's > machine but it is not possible to install the .net framework 2.0 beta on his [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Thanks, > Aaron > Why don't you simply ship the .NET framework along with your app? Because Microsoft EULA does not allow shipping the .Net 2.0 beta framework with an application. (This will probably change when v2.0 is formally release in November) SignatureTruth, James Curran [erstwhile-MVP] Home: www.noveltheory.com Work: www.njtheater.com Blog: www.honestillusion.com Day Job: www.partsearch.com Aaron, You are trying to get back in the past when all developers are dreaming of the future. .NET Framework has some system requirements. If you have machines that doesn't stand with the requirements, it's your problem. Anyhow, .NET framework is a BOX of dll's, right, but it must be distributed as is. Get back to the future, and forget about the past. - Moty - >I wrote a win app in .net 2.0 c#. I would like to demo this on my client's >machine but it is not possible to install the .net framework 2.0 beta on [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Thanks, > Aaron > I wrote a win app in .net 2.0 c#. I would like to demo this on my client's > machine but it is not possible to install the .net framework 2.0 beta on his [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Thanks, > Aaron You can embed Mono in your application, if your code is compatible with it: http://www.go-mono.com/embedded-api.html But I have no experience with it, so can't help you any further. Wiebe Tijsma Hi Aaron, contrary to all the somewhat (dare I say) negative replies, you are not the only person to ask for this kind of requirement. This kind of question cropped up a lot when .net was first released. Although I've never tried it, this product claims to be able to do what you want (in fact there are several other products out there too). http://thinstall.com/help/index.html?welcometothinstall.htm Please let me know how you get on. Best Regards, Mark. >I wrote a win app in .net 2.0 c#. I would like to demo this on my client's >machine but it is not possible to install the .net framework 2.0 beta on [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Thanks, > Aaron Mark, > Hi Aaron, contrary to all the somewhat (dare I say) negative replies, I thought that I told that there are possibilities. Cor Mark, > Hi Aaron, contrary to all the somewhat (dare I say) negative replies, you > are not the only person to ask for this kind of requirement. This kind of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Please let me know how you get on. Correction probably possibilities, because I don't know it for 2.0. However that are you not giving not positive as well. Cor It is not obvious to me from any of your posts that you indicated that there was any possibilities for him, in fact I'm not sure I really understood what you were trying to tell Aaron. Regardless, please keep to the original posters question rather than attempting to engage me in an argument. Br, Mark. > Mark, > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Cor None of the proposed "possibilities" (thinstall and salamander) are available for v2.0 Beta2. Willy. > It is not obvious to me from any of your posts that you indicated that > there was any possibilities for him, in fact I'm not sure I really [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >> >> Cor Hi Willy, on the thinstall website it stated something like 'is backwards compatible for all framworks and forwards compatible for future ones'. Is this a fact that they both definitely don't work for 2.0b2? If so, presumably they are going to produce a new version sometime? Br, Mark. > None of the proposed "possibilities" (thinstall and salamander) are > available for v2.0 Beta2. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >>> >>> Cor Mark, Do you believe all this? How can they guarantee to be forward compatible? Anyway, I don't see any mention of v2.0 Beta2 on their site, and at present you aren't allowed to distribute applications written with this beta stuff. Willy. > Hi Willy, on the thinstall website it stated something like 'is backwards > compatible for all framworks and forwards compatible for future ones'. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >>>> >>>> Cor Hi, Thinstall is way overpiced, IMHO. But check out RemoteSoft, they have a new product called the ".NET native compiler" which seems to do what you want. I haven't tried it myself. <http://www.remotesoft.com> Best regards, Rodger Sequence Diagram Editor - Draw sequence diagrams faster <http://www.SequenceDiagramEditor.com> > Hi Aaron, contrary to all the somewhat (dare I say) negative replies, you > are not the only person to ask for this kind of requirement. This kind of [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >>Thanks, >>Aaron Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.