 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / May 2004Nested Threads
Hi I need to use Nested Threads, I can throw a parent thread and then throw his son threads, but my problem is to make a pause, because sometimes I can't throw all son threads, I have to throw for example three, then I wait to finish to execute them and then throw the last two threads. And the parent thread has to finish until all his son threads have been executed. Is it possible to do it? Regards J.C. > Hi > > I need to use Nested Threads, I can throw a parent thread and then throw his son threads, but my problem is to make a pause, because sometimes I can't throw all son threads, I have to throw for example three, then I wait to finish to execute them and then throw the last two threads. And the parent thread has to finish until all his son threads have been executed. > Is it possible to do it? Use Thread.Join. Like this: using System; using System.Threading; public class Test { [STAThread] static void Main(string[] args) { Thread[] childThreads = new Thread[3]; childThreads[0] = new Thread( new ThreadStart(ChildThreadProc)); childThreads[1] = new Thread( new ThreadStart(ChildThreadProc)); childThreads[2] = new Thread( new ThreadStart(ChildThreadProc)); Console.WriteLine("Starting threads."); foreach (Thread t in childThreads) { t.Start(); } Console.WriteLine("Waiting for threads to finish."); foreach (Thread t in childThreads) { t.Join(); } Console.WriteLine("All threads finished."); } static void ChildThreadProc() { Thread.Sleep(1000); Console.WriteLine("Thread Finished."); } } Thanks a lot David, I apreciate your help. But now, my problem is when a parent Thread has a limit to throw its son threads. Let me explain: The parent thread has a queue, where all its sons wait to be executed, but there is a limit, only three threads can be executed at the same time and the other two have to wait to one of them finish its execution to be executed. When it happens, I have to throw the next son in the queue. Thread1 (parent) threadA (son) I can only execute the threads A, B and C threadB (son) D and E have to wait threadC (son) threadD (son) threadE (son) For example If B have finished, I check my Limit and I see, there is a place and I can throw another thread, in this case will be D and E has to wait. I have A, C and D running. Now, If A have finished, I do the same and throw the last one, in this case E. If all son threads have finished, the parent thread has to finish too. Is it posible to do it? Thanks again J.C. P.D. I'm sorry for my english, I try to explain me the best way. This algorithm is hopeless complicated. Either use the thread pool or explain why you need all this complicated stuff  SignatureRegards, Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx] Got tidbits? Get it here... http://tinyurl.com/27cok > Thanks a lot David, I apreciate your help. > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > P.D. I'm sorry for my english, I try to explain me the best way. Hey Juan, One way is to use a thread pool as Alvin Bruney states. Another way is to a synchronized queue containing some kind of objects containing information about the work each thread has to do. Then you start three worker threads that pull items out of this queue and do the work they are supposed to do. Meanwhile the main thread (your parent thread) can add new items to the queue. But as Alvin says, this is a complicated scenario. Do you really need to do this? Regards, Jakob. Hello, I am not sure that I fully understand the problem, but You could try something like this Have a "synchronization event". Each thread that finishes it's work raises this event. The event handler determines that the number of currently working threads is less than maximum allowed, and starts one more of the available threads The problem is that 2 threads might finish at same time, so they both will raise the event. So, You should use synchLocks when entering the event handler A pseudocode would be something like thi void ThreadFinishedHandler(); //Raised every time a thread is finishe Queue threadQueue; // The queue of threads available for executio Object syncObj; // the object used for syncronizatio So, 1. Start the threads(suppose they are A, B, C 2. Init the threads E, F, G as "waiting", put them into threadQueu 3. Suppose thread B has finished executin 3.1 Lock syncObjec 3.2 Raise event ThreadFinished, which actually means executing ThreadFinishedHandler() ThreadFinishedHandler now examines threadQueue, sees that there are available threads there, and chooses one of them by a special logic (say, it is G 4. Start G, remove G from threadQueue. Repea Andranik Khachatrya > I need to use Nested Threads Threads aren't nested - there's no hierarchy of threads. > I can throw a parent thread and then throw his son threads What do you mean by "throw" here? Do you mean "start"? > but my problem is to make a pause, because sometimes I can't throw > all son threads, I have to throw for example three, then I wait to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Is it possible to do it? Use Thread.Join to make one thread wait for another one to finish. SignatureJon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too if in the framework there's still mutex and semaphores, that's the way to go. look for Semaphores. they allow setting a count down, and whey will wait when they get back to zero. for example, you can create a semaphore with count 3... > Hi > > I need to use Nested Threads, I can throw a parent thread and then throw his son threads, but my problem is to make a pause, because sometimes I can't throw all son threads, I have to throw for example three, then I wait to finish to execute them and then throw the last two threads. And the parent thread has to finish until all his son threads have been executed. > Is it possible to do it? > > Regards > J.C. > if in the framework there's still mutex and semaphores, that's the way to > go. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > zero. > for example, you can create a semaphore with count 3... The framework doesn't contain semaphores, but they're easy to write from monitors. SignatureJon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.