Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

there seems to be some overhead between SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function written in C#. Why is this?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DR - 27 Oct 2007 05:24 GMT
there seems to be some overhead between SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function
written in C#. Why is this?

I have a simple wraper around System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.GetTimestamp() :

public partial class UserDefinedFunctions
{
   [Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlFunction]
   public static long GetTimestampF()
   {
       return System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.GetTimestamp();
   }
};

but if i run this it is hardly accurate. the time of getting from sql server
to a CLR function seems to be relatively slow for nanosecond calculations:

DECLARE @before bigint
DECLARE @after bigint
SET @before = dbo.GetTimestampF()
-- do something
SET @after = dbo.GetTimestampF()
SELECT @after - @before as nanoseconds

is there nyway to elimitate this overhead so that dbo.GetTimestampF()
executes as fast for TSQL as it is to call GetTimestampF() in C#?

If i call my GetTimestampF() on c# it executes fast enough for the
nanosecond results to be accurate
Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) - 29 Oct 2007 15:30 GMT
Is this true everytime you call the routine, or only the first. There will
be some JIT overhead on the first call. This is why websites now have the
ability to run through all of the pages and pre-JIT compile them.

Other than that, I would have to look at the SQL docs.

Signature

Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*************************************************

| Think outside the box!

*************************************************
> there seems to be some overhead between SQL Server 2005 and a CLR function
> written in C#. Why is this?
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> If i call my GetTimestampF() on c# it executes fast enough for the
> nanosecond results to be accurate

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.