I found VS 2005 to be really slow. Increasing the ram from 512mb to 1 gig
(max on my system) had a significant impact on performance - it brought it
from intolerable to tolerable.
Hello Jim,
> I found VS 2005 to be really slow. Increasing the ram from 512mb to 1
> gig (max on my system) had a significant impact on performance - it
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> TIA
>> Barry
Some tips to improve performance:
- Disabling the visrusscanner (or excluding the source directories) usually
helps a lot as well
- Invest in a real defragmentation tool (PerfectDisk, OO Defrag are good
ones)
- Put your Swap file on a different disk than your sources and visual studio
Apart from that my guess is that investing in memory and/or a faster harddrive
(say 10.000 rpm & 16MB cache) will give you much more performance gain than
a new processor. Newer processors usually aren't faster per-se, but have
multiple cores and/or hyperthreading. I'm not sure how much faster the compiler
gets when using either of those, my guess is that the overall performance
gain isn't that much over a single core environment.
--
Jesse Houwing
jesse.houwing at sogeti.n
UL-Tomten - 14 Aug 2007 10:58 GMT
On Aug 13, 5:22 pm, Jesse Houwing <jesse.houw...@newsgroup.nospam>
wrote:
> and/or a faster harddrive (say 10.000 rpm & 16MB cache)
Before investing in an expensive harddrive, use a RAM drive to emulate
a really fast harddrive (but get more RAM first, of course). For
example, I was mighty surprised when compilation of a WAP (VS2005 SP1)
sped up by exactly 0% when moving the project files and the ASP.NET
Temporary files to a RAM drive, but YMMV.