Getting 3.0 Facts Straight

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

sloan - 02 May 2007 19:42 GMT

Ok.

If anybody has a url , that'd be great.

My IT Department is asking for the exact lowdown on 3.0, from a machine/OS
perspective.

3.0 projects can be

developed on
a. XP SP2
b. Vista
c. ( I guess 2003Server, but how uses that as their personal OS)

and deployed on
2003Server
(some future version of Vista)

Oh man. I know I screwed that up somehow.

I found a few blogs, but would like group help with the concrete facts with
this one.

Reply to this Message

Andy - 02 May 2007 21:29 GMT

> Ok.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I found a few blogs, but would like group help with the concrete facts with
> this one.

It is already deployed on all versions of Vista, and can be deployed
to WinXP SP2. Check out the system requirements:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=10CC340B-F857-4A14-83F5
-25634C3BF043&displaylang=en

Reply to this Message

Andy - 02 May 2007 21:29 GMT

> Ok.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I found a few blogs, but would like group help with the concrete facts with
> this one.

OH yes.. your development assumptions are correct.

Reply to this Message

sloan - 02 May 2007 22:24 GMT

Thanks

> > Ok.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> OH yes.. your development assumptions are correct.

Reply to this Message

Göran Andersson - 02 May 2007 21:37 GMT

> Ok.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I found a few blogs, but would like group help with the concrete facts with
> this one.

Giving the release the version number 3.0 has caused a lot of confusion.
2.5 would have been a more fitting version number.

.NET Framework 3.0 is just framework 2.0 with WinFX, there are no
changes in the framework itself. The real framework 3.0 will not be
available until .NET Framework 3.5.

Signature

Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com

Reply to this Message

sloan - 02 May 2007 22:21 GMT

> Giving the release the version number 3.0 has caused a lot of confusion.
> 2.5 would have been a more fitting version number.

//

Yeah, I got that part of it.

But I can develop and deploy 2.0 code on win2000.

I'll use your hint "with WinFX" to find some more info as well.

Thanks for the hints.

> > Ok.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> changes in the framework itself. The real framework 3.0 will not be
> available until .NET Framework 3.5.

Reply to this Message

Getting 3.0 Facts Straight

Free Magazines