Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Net Framework 3 loads up 2 as well?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
skypeeper - 08 Apr 2007 14:58 GMT
Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
shows up in the Add/Remove Program list again?

Can't seem to permanently remove this one?

No error messages on the uninstall of 2.0, it said it was removed.

Insalled 3.0 and now 2.0 is magically back...

SkyPeeper
Henning Krause [MVP - Exchange] - 08 Apr 2007 15:09 GMT
Hello,

.NET 3.0 ist just an addon to .NET 2.0. Unlike 2.0, it does not replace the
previous versions, but extends them.

Best regards,
Henning Krause

> Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
> and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> SkyPeeper
pvdg42 - 08 Apr 2007 15:13 GMT
> Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
> and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> SkyPeeper

3.0 is 2.0 with extensions. It's not a true "new version" of the .NET
Framework.
skypeeper - 08 Apr 2007 15:28 GMT
Thanks folks.. I thought I was headed on my way to the "rubber
room"...

Thanks for reeling me back to sanity.

Skypeeper

> > Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
> > and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> 3.0 is 2.0 with extensions. It's not a true "new version" of the .NET
> Framework.
Patrice - 11 Apr 2007 11:54 GMT
Additionaly removing previous Framework version because you installed the
lastest one is not needed.

They are done to run side by side and it allows each application to run with
the matching version. In some cases you could have breaking changes
preventing old applications to run with the latest framework
(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa497239.aspx).

So unless you have space issues or other particular reason to do so I
wouldn't bother and would left previous installed version in place...

> Thanks folks.. I thought I was headed on my way to the "rubber
> room"...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> 3.0 is 2.0 with extensions. It's not a true "new version" of the .NET
>> Framework.
Rad [Visual C# MVP] - 09 Apr 2007 19:33 GMT
>> Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
>> and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> 3.0 is 2.0 with extensions. It's not a true "new version" of the .NET
> Framework.

I hope someone from Microsoft is reading this and that next time they know
when to increase the major version and when to increase the minor!
Signature

Bits.Bytes
http://bytes.thinkersroom.com

Chuck Heatherly - 10 Apr 2007 13:34 GMT
>>> Does anyone know why, after removing all versions of Net Framework,
>>> and then installing just the 3.0 redistributable package, that NF 2.0
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I hope someone from Microsoft is reading this and that next time they know
>when to increase the major version and when to increase the minor!

Actually, they haven't learned.  The release of Visual Studio "Orcas"
is supposed to include .NET Framework 3.5, which is a major new
version with tons of changes to the core libraries and new features,
not minor adjustments to the ones introduced in 3.0 (WF, WPF, WCF)
which is what a minor version increment would suggest.

Remember, this is the same company who plastered the .NET label on all
their products (Windows Server 2003 being named Windows .NET Server
until just a month before it was released) and then did the same with
the Live label last year.  It just shows that the people with brains
in the tech groups are totally owned by the idiots in marketing.

Chuck

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.