Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Runtime bridges Ja.NET and JNBridgePro vs Web Service

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
johnk - 14 Nov 2006 15:02 GMT
Hi,

We are looking for arguments for using technologies that allows .NET
Framework and Java to interoperate on a point to point basis.

The two options are XML Web Services and .NET Remoting with using third
party runtimebridges likes Ja.NET and JNBridgePro.

.NET Remoting technology provides greater performance then Web Services
in a pure .NET Framework environment. But Web Services provides more
freedom from having to dsescribe methods explicitly.

I like to hear experience in using thes two interoperability
technologies.

Best regards

John

References:
Interoperability Technologies: Point to Point
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnpag/html/jdni
_ch01.asp

Michael Nemtsev - 14 Nov 2006 18:41 GMT
Hello JohnK,

J> We are looking for arguments for using technologies that allows .NET
J> Framework and Java to interoperate on a point to point basis.

J> The two options are XML Web Services and .NET Remoting with using
J> third party runtimebridges likes Ja.NET and JNBridgePro.
J> .NET Remoting technology provides greater performance

Not always, comparing performance I'd say that WebServices beat Remoting
in number of cases
See there http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms996381.aspx

J> then Web Services in a pure .NET Framework environment.

There is nothing common with WebServices. WS is the mean of interoperability,
not the specific MS technology.
See the WS on the w3c http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/

J> But Web Services provides more freedom from having to describe methods
explicitly.
J> I like to hear experience in using thes two interoperability
J> technologies.

I suggest u to use WebServices. It's reasonable choice for the interoperability
among components and in cross-platforms systems.
The weak of remoting is no support for declarative extention.

---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

Rate this thread:







Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.