 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / August 2006Removing the " Web Form Designer Generated Code " region after converting from ASP.NET 1.1 to ASP.NET 2.0
I recently converted some ASP.NET 1.1 projects of mine, created with Visual Studio .NET 2003, to Web Application Projects in Visual Studio .NET 2005 so that I could use ASP.NET 2.0 (All my ASP.NET is done using VB.NET). After converting, everything was fine, and worked and compiled correctly, but I noticed one big difference between the VB.NET code of the converted files in the projects and the VB.NET code in new pages. The new pages use partial classes and do not have the " Web Form Designer Generated Code " region where the controls were declared. When I try to modify the code in the converted files to be like this, I recieve the following error: Name 'mycontrolid' is not declared. I am sure this is simply because I am not doing something or I am doing something wrong, but I cannot figure out what. Any ideas? Thanks.  SignatureNathan Sokalski njsokalski@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/ The separation of markup and code changed from "code-behind" in VS 2003 to "code-beside" in VS 2005. The @Page directive contains different properties in the new model. > I recently converted some ASP.NET 1.1 projects of mine, created with Visual > Studio .NET 2003, to Web Application Projects in Visual Studio .NET 2005 so [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I am sure this is simply because I am not doing something or I am doing > something wrong, but I cannot figure out what. Any ideas? Thanks. That's great, but it still doesn't help me know what I should change my code to. Here is my current @Page directive and Class definition from my TextFiles.aspx and TextFiles.aspx.vb files: <%@ Page Language="vb" AutoEventWireup="false" Codebehind="TextFiles.aspx.vb" Inherits="WebApplication1.TextFiles" enableViewState="False"%> Public Class TextFiles What changes do I need to make to this? SignatureNathan Sokalski njsokalski@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/ > The separation of markup and code changed from "code-behind" in VS 2003 to > "code-beside" in VS 2005. The @Page directive contains different [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> I am sure this is simply because I am not doing something or I am doing >> something wrong, but I cannot figure out what. Any ideas? Thanks. As far as I can tell, you only have to change Codebehind to CodeFile. > That's great, but it still doesn't help me know what I should change my code > to. Here is my current @Page directive and Class definition from my [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > What changes do I need to make to this? That makes sense, but here are several comments I have about that: 1. When I create a new WebForm it still uses Codebehind. I don't know if this has something to do with the fact that I am using the Visual Studio .NET 2005 Web Application Project model instead of the Visual Studio .NET 2005 Website model. 2. If I do change Codebehind to CodeFile I recieve an error saying 'TextFiles' is ambiguous in the namespace 'WebApplication1'. 3. I tried creating one of my simple WebForms from scratch (deleting the *.aspx and *.aspx.vb files and recreating it using the same controls and vb code). It compiled and worked with no errors, but when I modify all the lines of code in other WebForms to look the same (the @Page directive and !DOCTYPE tag in the *.aspx file and add the Partial keyword to the class definition in the *.aspx.vb file), it does not work. Is there some configuration file that gets modified when you create a new WebForm by going to Add->New Item? I am not sure why, but simply modifying the *.aspx and *.aspx.vb files of a WebForm won't let me get rid of the "Web Form Designer Generated Code " region that used to get added by Visual Studio .NET 2003. If anyone has any ideas, I would appreciate them. SignatureNathan Sokalski njsokalski@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/ > As far as I can tell, you only have to change Codebehind to CodeFile. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> What changes do I need to make to this? Hi there, I'm having the exact same problem. Just wondering if you ever found a resolution or workaround in the end? Cheers > That makes sense, but here are several comments I have about that: > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > >> > >> What changes do I need to make to this? What I discovered is that ASP.NET 2.0 organizes the code slightly differently. The control declarations created by the designer are now put in a file with the extension *.aspx.designer.vb or *.ascx.designer.vb. If you want to copy and paste the declarations from ASP.NET 1.1 code into one of these files, I would suggest that you create one file from scratch so that you can see what the file looks like, the file layout is very basic. Good Luck! SignatureNathan Sokalski njsokalski@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/ > Hi there, > [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] >> >> >> >> What changes do I need to make to this? Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.