Hi, thanks for the reply.
Some dlls export C API, and others export C++. But i would think if
there was a problem with C++ name decoration, i would get a different
kind of error, like "symbol not found".
I guess linking dlls with runtime statically would probably solve the
problem, but it would also make the footprint much bigger since all
runtime library code would have to be contained in each dll.
Any other way to do it?
Also, seems like java apps cannot use vs2005 dlls?
Thanks a lot
Yev
> Some dlls export C API, and others export C++. But i would think if
> there was a problem with C++ name decoration, i would get a different
> kind of error, like "symbol not found".
You just don't get that far. Once you overcome the CRT DLL hurdle,
you'll be hit by this problem.
> I guess linking dlls with runtime statically would probably solve the
> problem, but it would also make the footprint much bigger since all
> runtime library code would have to be contained in each dll.
>
> Any other way to do it?
Does your DLL have a manifest bound to it as a resource (to check, open
the DLL with resource editor)? It should look something like this:
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1"
manifestVersion="1.0">
<dependency>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="Microsoft.VC80.CRT"
version="8.0.50727.42" processorArchitecture="x86"
publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b"></assemblyIdentity>
</dependentAssembly>
</dependency>
</assembly>
My understanding is that, with the correct manifest, it should just
work. But I really know very little on the subject. Hopefully, somebody
more knowlegeable will chime in at this point.
> Also, seems like java apps cannot use vs2005 dlls?
I don't think Java apps particularly care about your build tool, as long
as the DLL exports all the right functions. It's probably the same
problem with msvcr80.dll

Signature
With best wishes,
Igor Tandetnik
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead. -- RFC 1925
yevvi@yahoo.com - 14 Jun 2006 02:07 GMT
Hi,
I found out that my dlls didnt contain manifest embedded in them, but
instead had .manifest files in the same directory. I embeded those
manifests into the dlls by running mt.exe /manifest file.dll.manifest
/outputresource:file.dll.
Unfortunately it still doesn't fix the problem. One thing i saw is
that .manifest files specify different version of runtime libraries
from the one installed in WinSxS folder. I tried to edit manifest
files to include the installed version instead, but it still doesn't
help. Would different versions cause problems? Anything else i might
be doing wrong?
Thanks
Yev
> > Some dlls export C API, and others export C++. But i would think if
> > there was a problem with C++ name decoration, i would get a different
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
> overhead. -- RFC 1925
www.fruitfruit.com - 14 Jun 2006 03:23 GMT
copy files from %VS80COMNTOOLS%\..\..\vc\redist\x86\ to the same directory
as your DLL may fix your problem.
> Hi,
> I found out that my dlls didnt contain manifest embedded in them, but
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>> land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
>> overhead. -- RFC 1925
Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP] - 14 Jun 2006 03:32 GMT
> copy files from %VS80COMNTOOLS%\..\..\vc\redist\x86\ to the same
> directory as your DLL may fix your problem.
No, don't do that. For CRT DLLs to work side by side, the EXE has to have a
manifest, something the OP is trying to avoid.
-cd
Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP] - 14 Jun 2006 03:34 GMT
> Hi,
> I found out that my dlls didnt contain manifest embedded in them, but
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> help. Would different versions cause problems? Anything else i might
> be doing wrong?
The "wrong" version in the manifest file is correct. There's a policy file
in the WinSxS directory that directs that version to the correct, finaly
verion of the DLLs.
You're probably embeddeing the manifest in the DLL with the wrong resource
ID. When embedded in an EXE, the manifest must have resource ID 1, but when
embedded in a DLL the ID must be 2.
See this thread for details:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc/msg/e84703d4
e19aa831?hl=en
-cd
yevvi@yahoo.com - 15 Jun 2006 02:23 GMT
After using resource id 2 it works.
Thanks a lot,
Yev
> > Hi,
> > I found out that my dlls didnt contain manifest embedded in them, but
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> -cd