Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsFree MagazinesWhite PapersSubmit Content
Discussion GroupsASP.NETWindows FormsLanguages.NET FrameworkVisual Studio.NET
Articles.NET FrameworkASP.NETToolsWindows Forms
.NET DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Visual Basic 6SQL ServerMS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

.NET Forum / .NET Framework / New Users / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Differences in 2.0 depending on OS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kurt sune - 03 Mar 2006 14:15 GMT
I have heard that framework 2.0 behaves differently if run on w2000 server
versus w2003 server.
That is when run on 2003 usese the os for things that when run on 2000 it
has to solve differently due to differences in funcionality in the two os's.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

I am also trying to find evidence  that if I am developing web applications
I need a ws2003 server as development machine, no good using w2000ws or xp.

Can anyone shed some light on this also?

/k
Kevin Spencer - 03 Mar 2006 17:23 GMT
>I have heard that framework 2.0 behaves differently if run on w2000 server
> versus w2003 server.

The 2.0 Framework includes support for services that are not available on
Windows 2000. It also has security features that exceed Windows 2000
security, and are therefore not applicable to Windows 2000. Other than that,
it runs the same.

> I am also trying to find evidence  that if I am developing web
> applications
> I need a ws2003 server as development machine, no good using w2000ws or
> xp.

Not true. ASP.Net 2.0 apps can run on IIS 5 as well as IIS 6.

Signature

HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
.Net Developer

Presuming that God is "only an idea" -
Ideas exist.
Therefore, God exists.

>I have heard that framework 2.0 behaves differently if run on w2000 server
> versus w2003 server.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> /k
Michael Nemtsev - 03 Mar 2006 23:52 GMT
Hello kurt,

Developing web app in ws2003 is more convenient, because IIS has advances
support for development and no 5 connections limits

ks> I am also trying to find evidence  that if I am developing web
ks> applications I need a ws2003 server as development machine, no good
ks> using w2000ws or xp.

---
WBR,
Michael  Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.msn.com/laflour

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.